Re: [systemd-devel] Question about service dependency handling in systemd-228

2017-11-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 26.11.2017 um 10:47 schrieb Bao Nguyen: Regard to your question, "asi-My-5101.socket" depends on "My-sshd.target", I think that in my case it is expected as my socket listens on a specific address IP:port so it should start after a network service to configure and assign IP address before

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about service dependency handling in systemd-228

2017-11-26 Thread Bao Nguyen
Hi Uoti, Thanks a lot for your answer, I have checked the cycle. It is created by sockets.target -> asi-My-5101.socket -> My-sshd.target -> My-syncd.service -> My-nfs-client.service -> My-handling.service -> basic.target -> sockets.target. I do not see the same cycle in systemd-210 so I said that

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about service dependency handling in systemd-228

2017-11-26 Thread Mantas Mikul─Śnas
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Bao Nguyen wrote: > Hi Uoti, > > Thanks a lot for your answer, I have checked the cycle. It is created by > sockets.target > -> asi-My-5101.socket -> My-sshd.target -> My-syncd.service -> > My-nfs-client.service > -> My-handling.service ->

Re: [systemd-devel] stacked automounts

2017-11-26 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 09:03:23PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > Is there a way to have stacked automounts? Not really. > In this example only /d is mounted when /d/l/1/ is accessed: > > LABEL=d/d xfs > noatime,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.idle-timeout=22 1 2 > /d/i/1.iso /d/l/1

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about service dependency handling in systemd-228

2017-11-26 Thread Bao Nguyen
Hi, Thanks all for your comments. I will try to use option FreeBind. However could anyone explain for me that I did not use FreeBind option in systems-210 but all my services start well? I am still inclined to the different of systemd-228 and systemd-210 causes the current issue. Thanks again,