[systemd-devel] Antw: /bin/systemctl vs /usr/bin/systemctl

2019-08-06 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Thomas Güttler schrieb am 06.08.2019 um 16:37 in Nachricht <3243dc34-4eec-e3a0-c6fd-491fdfcaf...@thomas-guettler.de>: > I just realized that the location of systemctl varies across linux > distributions. > > Ubuntu: /bin/systemctl > SuSE: /usr/bin/systemctl I guess it should be

Re: [systemd-devel] /bin/systemctl vs /usr/bin/systemctl

2019-08-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.08.19 um 16:37 schrieb Thomas Güttler: > I just realized that the location of systemctl varies across linux > distributions. > > Ubuntu: /bin/systemctl > SuSE: /usr/bin/systemctl > > Which one do you think is better?

Re: [systemd-devel] /bin/systemctl vs /usr/bin/systemctl

2019-08-06 Thread Kenneth Porter
I wasn't aware of this change to the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard and looked it up. Here's the details on what happened: ___ systemd-devel mailing list

Re: [systemd-devel] /bin/systemctl vs /usr/bin/systemctl

2019-08-06 Thread Andy Pieters
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:44 PM Thomas Güttler wrote: > I just realized that the location of systemctl varies across linux > distributions. > > Ubuntu: /bin/systemctl > SuSE: /usr/bin/systemctl > > Which one do you think is better? > Obviously /usr/bin since /bin is a symbolic link to /usr/bin

[systemd-devel] /bin/systemctl vs /usr/bin/systemctl

2019-08-06 Thread Thomas Güttler
I just realized that the location of systemctl varies across linux distributions. Ubuntu: /bin/systemctl SuSE: /usr/bin/systemctl Which one do you think is better? Regards, Thomas Güttler -- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ I am looking for feedback:

[systemd-devel] devilspie2 user service issues

2019-08-06 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
Greetings, I am trying to write a service file for a tool called devilspie2. % systemctl --user cat devilspie.service # /home/mzagrabe/.config/systemd/user/devilspie.service [Unit] Description=devilspie [Service] ExecStart=/usr/bin/devilspie2 [Install] WantedBy=default.target which I enabled

Re: [systemd-devel] devilspie2 user service issues

2019-08-06 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
Thanks for the reply, Mantas! On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:24 PM Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:08 PM Matt Zagrabelny > wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I am trying to write a service file for a tool called devilspie2. >> >> % systemctl --user cat devilspie.service >> #

Re: [systemd-devel] devilspie2 user service issues

2019-08-06 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:08 PM Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Greetings, > > I am trying to write a service file for a tool called devilspie2. > > % systemctl --user cat devilspie.service > # /home/mzagrabe/.config/systemd/user/devilspie.service > [Unit] > Description=devilspie > > [Service] >

[systemd-devel] startup hang at 'load/save random seed'

2019-08-06 Thread Chris Murphy
This is a new problem I'm seeing just today on Fedora Rawhide 5.3.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc31.x86_64+debug systemd-243~rc1-1.fc31.x86_64 The problem doesn't happen when reverting to systemd-242-6.git9d34e79.fc31.x86_64 The hang lasts about 4-5 minutes, then boot proceeds. Or if I head to early-debug

Re: [systemd-devel] startup hang at 'load/save random seed'

2019-08-06 Thread Chris Murphy
[ 10.281769] fmac.local systemd[1]: Starting Update UTMP about System Boot/Shutdown... [ 10.295504] fmac.local audit[806]: SYSTEM_BOOT pid=806 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg=' comm="systemd-update-utmp" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-update-utmp"

Re: [systemd-devel] lto issues

2019-08-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > today I tried compiling systemd v242 (on Debian sid) once using lto > (-Db_lto=true) and once without lto (-Db_lto=false). > > The lto build took approximately twice as long on my laptop (using > dpkg-buildpackage, which

Re: [systemd-devel] lto issues

2019-08-06 Thread Michael Biebl
Am Di., 6. Aug. 2019 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today I tried compiling systemd v242 (on Debian sid) once using lto > > (-Db_lto=true) and once without lto (-Db_lto=false). > > > > The lto

Re: [systemd-devel] service fails to use the latest value of the slice

2019-08-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 06.08.19 08:58, TARANA, YASHASHVI (yashashvi.tar...@hpe.com) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > Thank you for getting back. I just subscribed to the systemd-devel mailing > list and hence I'm resending the mail. > > We were following below article to get around the situation where a process >

Re: [systemd-devel] service fails to use the latest value of the slice

2019-08-06 Thread TARANA, YASHASHVI
Hi Lennart, Thank you for getting back. I just subscribed to the systemd-devel mailing list and hence I'm resending the mail. We were following below article to get around the situation where a process fails to get realtime priority on a system once the CPUAccounting is enabled.

Re: [systemd-devel] lto issues

2019-08-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sa, 03.08.19 19:03, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > today I tried compiling systemd v242 (on Debian sid) once using lto > (-Db_lto=true) and once without lto (-Db_lto=false). > > The lto build took approximately twice as long on my laptop (using > dpkg-buildpackage, which

Re: [systemd-devel] lto issues

2019-08-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:34:36AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am Di., 6. Aug. 2019 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > : > > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > today I tried compiling systemd v242 (on Debian sid) once using