Hi,
I'm running systemd v245 (in the host and in the containers) and I
have 2 containers whose veth link is connected to a bridge.
One container named "c1" uses "DHCPServer=yes" and is supposed to
provide an ipv4 address to the second container "c2" but for some
reasons it seems that no DHCP
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 17:51 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 06.05.20 15:50, Peter Morrow (
> peter.mor...@microsoft.com
> ) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 17:39 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mi, 22.04.20 14:44, Peter Morrow (
> > > peter.mor...@microsoft.com
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 17:39 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 22.04.20 14:44, Peter Morrow (
> peter.mor...@microsoft.com
> ) wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I'm trying to optimise our boot process and have started to look at
> > the time it takes for the network to come up (a single
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:18:34PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 04.05.20 08:31, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:52:37AM +0530, nitish nagesh wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >We have this odd want to move a daemon between different systemd
On Mi, 06.05.20 22:05, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:18:34PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mo, 04.05.20 08:31, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:52:37AM +0530, nitish nagesh wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> >
On Mi, 06.05.20 23:43, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running systemd v245 (in the host and in the containers) and I
> have 2 containers whose veth link is connected to a bridge.
>
> One container named "c1" uses "DHCPServer=yes" and is supposed to
> provide an ipv4
Hi All,
My requirement is my system should get locked automatically when the system is
idle for 5min.
So for this I have configured /etc/system/logind.conf file as
IdleAction = lock
IdleActionSec=2min
And I restarted systemd service with 'setemctl restart system-logind.service'
and I kept my
Linux-4.19.0-5-amd64
Debian-buster
Systemd - systemd-241
Regards
Archana
From: systemd-devel On Behalf Of
Archana Polampalli
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 12:11 PM
To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [systemd-devel] IdleAction=lock not working in ubuntu
Hi All,
My requirement is
On Mi, 06.05.20 06:40, Archana Polampalli (archana.c...@toshiba-tsip.com) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My requirement is my system should get locked automatically when the system
> is idle for 5min.
> So for this I have configured /etc/system/logind.conf file as
> IdleAction = lock
> IdleActionSec=2min
Thank you very much for the prompt reply
I am using 'gnome' Desktop Environment
Regards,
Archana
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 2:14 PM
To: Archana Polampalli
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel]
Hi Lennart ,
I have few more questions,
1.I have run $loginctl lock-session command in gnome DE,it is
locking the session. and why it is not locking through logind.conf parameters.
2.As per my investigation on session locking, logind uses DBus to propagate
the "Lock" event .we will need an
Dear Ulrich,
Am 06.05.20 um 11:21 schrieb Ulrich Windl:
I have a question for systemd-228-150.82.1.x86_64 (of SLES12 SP4):
While developing a script for logrotate, I tested this command with the
following result:
# systemctl kill -s HUP --kill-who=15862 iotwatch@LOC1.service
Failed to kill
>>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 06.05.2020 um 11:24 in
Nachricht
<11141_1588757087_5EB2825F_11141_72_1_3a082624-966b-a922-f8b9-ef0bb69c32f0@thelo
nge.net>:
>
> Am 06.05.20 um 11:21 schrieb Ulrich Windl:
>> # systemctl kill -s HUP --kill-who=15862 iotwatch@LOC1.service
>>
>> Did I misinterpret
Hi!
I have a question for systemd-228-150.82.1.x86_64 (of SLES12 SP4):
While developing a script for logrotate, I tested this command with the
following result:
# systemctl kill -s HUP --kill-who=15862 iotwatch@LOC1.service
Failed to kill unit iotwatch@LOC1.service: Invalid who argument 15862
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2020, 11:21 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Windl:
> Hi!
>
> I have a question for systemd-228-150.82.1.x86_64 (of SLES12 SP4):
> While developing a script for logrotate, I tested this command with the
> following result:
>
> # systemctl kill -s HUP --kill-who=15862
On 5/4/20 3:57 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
but
hostnamectl --static set-hostname 'static' where current static hostname
is already 'static' then transient hostname is never set.
What do you think about it ?
Hello,
am I wrong on this one ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
>>> Paul Menzel schrieb am 06.05.2020 um
11:26 in Nachricht
<12189_1588757179_5EB282BB_12189_122_1_f3c28f74-4675-ff7b-edd2-66f52e12831f@molg
n.mpg.de>:
> Dear Ulrich,
>
>
> Am 06.05.20 um 11:21 schrieb Ulrich Windl:
>
>> I have a question for systemd-228-150.82.1.x86_64 (of SLES12 SP4):
>>
> On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 16:27, Mark Bannister wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm missing something or oversimplifying, but I tried to
> > reproduce the problem as follows: I created a script that ignores INT,
> > TERM and HUP and then loops indefinitely writing the time every second
> > to a log file. I
Good Morning List,
Does anyone know how complicated of a regular expression can be utilized in a
udev rule?
For instance I have a system with a lot of drives (sda through z aren't enough)
and I want to write a rule that will match the physical block devices for one
rule and then a separate
4.IdleAction=lock does it work in tty console .
-Original Message-
From: Archana Polampalli
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 2:52 PM
To: 'Archana Polampalli' ; Lennart Poettering
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [systemd-devel] IdleAction=lock not working in ubuntu
Hi
On Do, 16.04.20 14:03, Luca Boccassi (luca.bocca...@microsoft.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We find ourselves in a situation where application running
> containerized (specifically as portable services, although this issue
> is general) need to either find information about the host, or alter
> their
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 06.05.2020 um 15:43
in
Nachricht <20200506134333.GC89018@gardel-login>:
> On Mi, 06.05.20 13:03, Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS) (kevin.bo...@ngc.com)
wrote:
>
>> Ulrich,
>>
>> I just noticed that too. This seems rather restrictive given that one
could
> have a
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:23 PM Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS)
wrote:
>
> Good Morning List,
>
>
>
> Does anyone know how complicated of a regular expression can be utilized in a
> udev rule?
>
I would ask udev manual page :)
>
>
> For instance I have a system with a lot of drives (sda through z
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:43 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Mi, 06.05.20 13:03, Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS) (kevin.bo...@ngc.com) wrote:
>
> > Ulrich,
> >
> > I just noticed that too. This seems rather restrictive given that one
> > could have a system with many drives, and with GPT it is not
John Ioannidis writes:
> Is there a document somewhere that details what the
> interactions/conflicts/etc are between systemd.{link,netdev,network} and
> the ifupdown mechanisms? I have read the manual pages, of course, but I
> feel I'm missing something fundamental. I finally got around to moving
On Mi, 06.05.20 12:15, Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS) (kevin.bo...@ngc.com) wrote:
> Good Morning List,
>
> Does anyone know how complicated of a regular expression can be
> utilized in a udev rule?
udev supports shell-style globbing for matching, but no regular
expressions. The man page says that
Ulrich,
I just noticed that too. This seems rather restrictive given that one could
have a system with many drives, and with GPT it is not unreasonable to have a
large number of partitions as well.
There should be a way in udev to write rules that can distinguish between
/dev/sda and
On Fr, 10.04.20 12:06, David J (ema...@icloud.com) wrote:
> Giacinto,
> Thanks for further explaining my email.
>
> Lennart,
> Thank you for your feedback. What I am doing is writing an sd-bus
> interface and a client code, which is only interested in specific
> signal information. So the
On Di, 05.05.20 08:48, Aviram, Nimrod (navi...@bottomline.com) wrote:
> HI,
>
> I've been using the following service to control our catalane server for the
> past few years now.
> After upgrading OS to RHEL 7.8 , the service fails to start.
> I'm usually creating a basic user (cfrm) to run
So therefore udev should be able to make use of extended globbing...?
-Original Message-
From: Andrei Borzenkov
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2020 9:49 AM
To: Lennart Poettering
Cc: Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS) ;
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: EXT :Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT]
>>> "Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS)" schrieb am 06.05.2020 um
14:15
in Nachricht
<16534_1588767787_5EB2AC2A_16534_16_1_d2c2e1aff05740ea9d1ea3e1325511b2@XCGVAG30.
orthgrum.com>:
> Good Morning List,
>
> Does anyone know how complicated of a regular expression can be utilized in
> a udev rule?
>
> For
On Do, 16.04.20 16:56, Simon McVittie (s...@collabora.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 14:03:43 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > But I found at least one other use case where this is needed, and the
> > solution there is to add a new directory /host/ which replicates part
> > of the host's
On Mi, 06.05.20 13:03, Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS) (kevin.bo...@ngc.com) wrote:
> Ulrich,
>
> I just noticed that too. This seems rather restrictive given that one could
> have a system with many drives, and with GPT it is not unreasonable to have a
> large number of partitions as well.
>
> There
On Mo, 04.05.20 08:31, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:52:37AM +0530, nitish nagesh wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >We have this odd want to move a daemon between different systemd slices.
> > Not sure if that's even a valid thing to do, but here is the
On Mi, 22.04.20 14:44, Peter Morrow (peter.mor...@microsoft.com) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm trying to optimise our boot process and have started to look at
> the time it takes for the network to come up (a single interface to be
> routable) when using systemd-networkd:
>
> Can anyone offer any
Hi Lennart,
I've had debug logging on for a while (it's mentioned in my first email, but I
concede that was rather long). Unfortunately, I will admit to not being
particularly familiar with dbus or the signals I should be looking for.
Is there a direction you could point me in (either
On Wed, 06 May 2020 at 16:39:39 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 16.04.20 16:56, Simon McVittie (s...@collabora.com) wrote:
> > /run/host seems like a reasonable convention to encourage for
> > container/host systems that want this, since it doesn't require
> > inventing a new top-level
On Mi, 06.05.20 15:50, Peter Morrow (peter.mor...@microsoft.com) wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 17:39 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mi, 22.04.20 14:44, Peter Morrow (
> > peter.mor...@microsoft.com
> > ) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to optimise our boot process and
On So, 26.04.20 19:08, Dark Penguin (darkpeng...@yandex.com) wrote:
> Very often I have encountered one problem: during shutdown, systemd has
> to wait for something. Of course, it is probably different things every
> time, and it is probably not systemd's fault, at least some of the cases.
>
>
On So, 03.05.20 23:03, Arian Van Putten (ar...@wire.com) wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I'm in the process of experimenting with a systemd-based initrd.
> However I have two questions concerning the boot process that came up
> whilst reading the documentation.
>
> If I understand "man 7 bootup" correctly
On Mo, 04.05.20 11:52, nitish nagesh (nagesh.nit...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
>We have this odd want to move a daemon between different systemd slices.
> Not sure if that's even a valid thing to do, but here is the
> requirement.
The Linux kernel gets a bit confused with accounting if you
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 15:58, Mark Bannister wrote:
>
> I repeated the exact same test with a different user account, one
> set-up specifically for this test and nothing else, so there was only
> one SSH session. But 'systemctl list-jobs' always reported 'No jobs
> running' even after the SSH
On Mi, 29.04.20 23:26, McKay, Sean (sean.mc...@hpe.com) wrote:
> Do you have any guidance on what I should look at to determine what
> is causing the show_status variable in systemd to get flipped to
> true without any apparent unit failures? Is there an easy way to
> find that information?
43 matches
Mail list logo
