On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:42:34AM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Karol Lewandowski
k.lewando...@samsung.com wrote:
On 05/07/2013 01:32 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue,
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:42:34AM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Karol Lewandowski
k.lewando...@samsung.com wrote:
On 05/07/2013 01:32 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 07.05.13 13:21, Karol Lewandowski (k.lewando...@samsung.com) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm,
Signed-off-by: Karol Lewandowski k.lewando...@samsung.com
diff --git a/man/systemd.unit.xml b/man/systemd.unit.xml
index 49103da..256c813 100644
--- a/man/systemd.unit.xml
+++ b/man/systemd.unit.xml
@@ -984,8 +984,9 @@
may be used to check whether the given
On Tue, 07.05.13 13:21, Karol Lewandowski (k.lewando...@samsung.com) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, does that directory always exist? Or only if AppArmor is actually
runtime enabled?
I.e. this check should ideally only return true if SMACK is not only
built into the kernel, but actually really enabled
On 05/07/2013 01:32 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 07.05.13 13:21, Karol Lewandowski (k.lewando...@samsung.com) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, does that directory always exist? Or only if AppArmor is actually
runtime enabled?
/sys/fs/smackfs is only registered when smack lsm is actually
