Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Lennart, Am 01.04.20 um 17:10 schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Mi, 01.04.20 14:23, Paul Menzel (pmenzel+systemd-de...@molgen.mpg.de) wrote: After=device should work. udev announces device after all rules have been processed. After= only orders, but this doesn't pull the device unit into

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 02.04.20 11:30, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Thinking about this: it might make sense to revisit this > > eventually... for example maybe instead of having gdm run all the time > > and just listening to SeatAdded/SeatRemoved and CanGraphical property > > changes and then

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:08:06 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 02.04.20 10:35, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > I don't think you need to wait for CanGraphical. I mean, the value of > > > that field just reflects whether at least one DRM or other graphical > > > device

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 02.04.20 10:35, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > I don't think you need to wait for CanGraphical. I mean, the value of > > that field just reflects whether at least one DRM or other graphical > > device was discovered associated with the seat. > > Hi, > > what other

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:35:49 +0300 Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:09:59 +0200 > Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Mi, 01.04.20 11:34, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > > > Is there a way to order a service in such a way, that it’s guaranteed > > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:09:59 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mi, 01.04.20 11:34, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > Is there a way to order a service in such a way, that it’s guaranteed > > > > that > > > > udev rules to devices were applied? > > > > > > > > A small

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 01.04.20 14:23, Paul Menzel (pmenzel+systemd-de...@molgen.mpg.de) wrote: > > > After=device should work. udev announces device after all rules have > > > been processed. > > > > After= only orders, but this doesn't pull the device unit into the job > > queue. To do that, you need to add

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 01.04.20 11:34, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Is there a way to order a service in such a way, that it’s guaranteed that > > > udev rules to devices were applied? > > > > > > A small script applying permissions and ownership manually in > > > `ExecStartPre=` seems to

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-01 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Andrei, dear Lennart, Thank you very much for your answers. Am 31.03.20 um 17:09 schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Do, 19.03.20 20:24, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: 19.03.2020 19:47, Paul Menzel пишет: I am using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 245.2 and Weston 8.0.0.

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-01 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:08:49 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 19.03.20 17:47, Paul Menzel (pmenzel+systemd-de...@molgen.mpg.de) > wrote: > > > Dear systemd folks, > > > > > > I am using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 245.2 and Weston 8.0.0. > > > > I amtrying to start a graphical

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-03-31 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 19.03.20 20:24, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > 19.03.2020 19:47, Paul Menzel пишет: > > Dear systemd folks, > > > > > > I am using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 245.2 and Weston 8.0.0. > > > > I amtrying to start a graphical desktop as soon as possible. Currently, > > I

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-03-31 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 19.03.20 17:47, Paul Menzel (pmenzel+systemd-de...@molgen.mpg.de) wrote: > Dear systemd folks, > > > I am using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 245.2 and Weston 8.0.0. > > I amtrying to start a graphical desktop as soon as possible. Currently, I > use Weston, but unfortunately accessing

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-03-20 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:47:30 +0100 Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear systemd folks, > > > I am using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 245.2 and Weston 8.0.0. > > I amtrying to start a graphical desktop as soon as possible. Currently, > I use Weston, but unfortunately accessing `/dev/dri/card0` it

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-03-19 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
19.03.2020 19:47, Paul Menzel пишет: > Dear systemd folks, > > > I am using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 245.2 and Weston 8.0.0. > > I amtrying to start a graphical desktop as soon as possible. Currently, > I use Weston, but unfortunately accessing `/dev/dri/card0` it gets a > permission

[systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-03-19 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear systemd folks, I am using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 245.2 and Weston 8.0.0. I amtrying to start a graphical desktop as soon as possible. Currently, I use Weston, but unfortunately accessing `/dev/dri/card0` it gets a permission denied error. The Weston service unit is ordered