Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v218

2015-02-04 Thread Simon McVittie
On 03/02/15 23:43, Lennart Poettering wrote: The way I understand /usr/local, it is the place where the admin himself places his own scripts and stuff, as extensions for the host OS. Yes, that view is consistent with the FHS (and e.g. Debian Policy's interpretation of the FHS). ./configure

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v218

2015-02-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 12.12.14 14:25, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: Lennart Poettering wrote on 11/12/14 00:16: * All systemd programs that read standalone configuration files in /etc now also support a corresponding series of .conf.d configuration directories

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v218

2015-02-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 12.12.14 15:57, Matthias Urlichs (matth...@urlichs.de) wrote: Hi, Colin Guthrie: What's the argument for including /usr/local in all this stuff? Feels wrong to me. +ME_TOO. /usr/local frequently has wider permissions than reasonable for something that can affect system

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v218

2014-12-14 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Heya! Here's the next version of systemd, v218: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-218.tar.xz Hi Lennart, It looks like the tarball is missing units/user/systemd-consoled.service. make[2]:

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v218

2014-12-14 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:32:42AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Heya! Here's the next version of systemd, v218: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-218.tar.xz Hi Lennart, It looks like

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v218

2014-12-12 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Colin Guthrie: What's the argument for including /usr/local in all this stuff? Feels wrong to me. +ME_TOO. /usr/local frequently has wider permissions than reasonable for something that can affect system startup. I can think of one argument in favor of this -- you can modify the system

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v218

2014-12-12 Thread J├│hann B. Gu├░mundsson
On 12/12/2014 02:57 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Colin Guthrie: What's the argument for including /usr/local in all this stuff? Feels wrong to me. +ME_TOO. /usr/local frequently has wider permissions than reasonable for something that can affect system startup. I can think of one