On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:38:59AM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
[..]
So with nofail opion for rootfs we should have following situation.
- sysroot.mount
Before=initrd-root-fs.target
- initrd-root-fs.target
Requires=sysroot.mount
OnFailure=emergency.target
-
В Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:46:56 -0400
Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com пишет:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:38:59AM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
[..]
So with nofail opion for rootfs we should have following situation.
- sysroot.mount
Before=initrd-root-fs.target
-
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:30:03PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
What happens if nofail is specified and device is present and there
are file system errors. Will fsck continue with boot or drop user into
a shell during boot and force to fix file system failures?
fsck cares about nofail option only
On 04/08/14 at 06:02pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:14:33AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
[..]
Defining a new target which by default waits for all the local fs
target
sounds interesting. Again, I have the question, what will happen to
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:36:13PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 04/08/14 at 06:02pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:14:33AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
[..]
Defining a new target which by default waits for all the local fs
target
sounds
В Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:49:47 -0400
Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com пишет:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:36:13PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 04/08/14 at 06:02pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:14:33AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
[..]
Defining a new
On 04/08/14 at 02:14am, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:10:14PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:07:20PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:40:17 -0400
Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com пишет:
Defining a new
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 06:35:03PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 04/08/14 at 02:14am, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:10:14PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:07:20PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:40:17 -0400
Vivek
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:14:33AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
[..]
Defining a new target which by default waits for all the local fs target
sounds interesting. Again, I have the question, what will happen to
local-fs-all.target if some device does not show up and say
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 04:24:01AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:30:03PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:44:50PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
In kdump kernel, we need mount certain file system, and we use nofail
for all mounts
В Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:40:17 -0400
Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com пишет:
Defining a new target which by default waits for all the local fs target
sounds interesting. Again, I have the question, what will happen to
local-fs-all.target if some device does not show up and say one of the
mounts
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:07:20PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:40:17 -0400
Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com пишет:
Defining a new target which by default waits for all the local fs target
sounds interesting. Again, I have the question, what will happen to
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:10:14PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:07:20PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:40:17 -0400
Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com пишет:
Defining a new target which by default waits for all the local fs target
sounds
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:44:50PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
In kdump kernel, we need mount certain file system, and we use nofail
for all mounts specified in /etc/fstab. Because we don't want any mount
failure to interrupt the boot process to arrive at
dracut-pre-pivot.service (This is the
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:30:03PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:44:50PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
In kdump kernel, we need mount certain file system, and we use nofail
for all mounts specified in /etc/fstab. Because we don't want any mount
failure to interrupt the boot
15 matches
Mail list logo
