On Sun, 01.06.14 22:03, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Sat, 31.05.14 18:21, Rico Sagner (sag...@b1-systems.de) wrote:
Heya!
I think that the two ids would probably be better exposed by
On Mon, 02.06.14 13:31, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
On 01/06/14 20:03, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
Out of curiosity, wouldn't the existing
org.freedesktop.DBus.Peer.GetMachineId() work here?
In principle Peer.GetMachineId() returns the D-Bus machine ID
On 01/06/14 20:03, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
Out of curiosity, wouldn't the existing
org.freedesktop.DBus.Peer.GetMachineId() work here?
In principle Peer.GetMachineId() returns the D-Bus machine ID
/var/lib/dbus/machine-id, which in rare cases won't match the systemd
machine ID /etc/machine-id,
On Sat, 31.05.14 18:21, Rico Sagner (sag...@b1-systems.de) wrote:
Heya!
I think that the two ids would probably be better exposed by PID 1
istelf, instead of hostnamed. It's a bit difficult to come up with a
rule which props should be exposed from hostnamed and which ones from
PID1, but I think
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Sat, 31.05.14 18:21, Rico Sagner (sag...@b1-systems.de) wrote:
Heya!
I think that the two ids would probably be better exposed by PID 1
istelf, instead of hostnamed. It's a bit difficult to come up with a
