On 1 June 2015 at 09:03, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 29.05.15 00:24, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
On 28 May 2015 at 18:08, Lennart Poettering
On 29 May 2015 at 11:25, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 29.05.15 00:24, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
On 28 May 2015 at 18:08, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.15 16:42, Dimitri John Ledkov
On Fri, 29.05.15 12:42, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 11:25, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 29.05.15 00:24, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
On 28 May 2015 at 18:08, Lennart Poettering
On 29 May 2015 at 14:41, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 29.05.15 12:42, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 11:25, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 29.05.15 00:24, Dimitri John Ledkov
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-29 17:02 +0200]:
I'd really just introduce a new kernel cmdline option:
systemd.debug-unified-cgroup=1 or so. A simple boolean that gets you
either one or the other behaviour. Maybe make the default for this
setting configurable with a configure script switch. And
On Fri, 29.05.15 17:09, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-29 17:02 +0200]:
I'd really just introduce a new kernel cmdline option:
systemd.debug-unified-cgroup=1 or so. A simple boolean that gets you
either one or the other behaviour. Maybe make the
On Fri, 29.05.15 15:52, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
And yeah, getting proper notifications especially for the container
case is the most important thing for me too.
Right. I have it as compile option at the moment, and i'm booting
fresh VMs with it. I do
On Thu, 28.05.15 16:42, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
It appears in /proc/self/cgroup as `0::/'
What precisely does this fix?
I mean, we need to do some major rework of things before the unified
hierarchy is really supported in systemd, and this one thing won't
really
On 28 May 2015 at 18:08, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.15 16:42, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
It appears in /proc/self/cgroup as `0::/'
What precisely does this fix?
I mean, we need to do some major rework of things before the
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1432827774-10868-1-git-send-email-dimitri.j.ledkov%40intel.com
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
___
systemd-devel
10 matches
Mail list logo
