On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Hi,
I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
/proc/self/mounts as it should.
So, in systemd-215 tmpfile.d fails to create a symbolic link /etc/mtab
because /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/etc.conf contains is a line L+
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov intelfx...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Hi,
I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
/proc/self/mounts as it should.
So, in systemd-215 tmpfile.d fails to create a symbolic
On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:13:55, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov intelfx...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Hi,
I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
/proc/self/mounts as it should.
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 09:15:28PM +0400, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:13:55, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov intelfx...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Hi,
I have a
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:44:05PM -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 09:15:28PM +0400, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:13:55, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov intelfx...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday 06 July
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 08:13:56PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:44:05PM -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote:
So... the solution would be for distro packages to ship mtab as a symlink to
../proc instead of /proc?
No, the latter is fine, or even better.
On Sun, 06.07.14 13:01, Leonid Isaev (lis...@umail.iu.edu) wrote:
Hi,
I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
/proc/self/mounts as it should.
So, in systemd-215 tmpfile.d fails to create a symbolic link /etc/mtab
because /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/etc.conf contains is
On Sun, 06.07.14 13:44, Leonid Isaev (lis...@umail.iu.edu) wrote:
I think the path matching is a little naive; Using a simple string
comparison, /proc/self/mounts != ../proc/self/mounts even though
both paths refer to the same object.
No, they aren't referring to the same object.
On Sun, 06.07.14 20:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
I think the path matching is a little naive; Using a simple string
comparison, /proc/self/mounts != ../proc/self/mounts even though
both paths refer to the same object.
No, they aren't referring to