On 18/08/21 12:24 pm, Amish wrote:
Hello
Further to my previous email:
I see that there is already an *extremely similar issue* reported on
July 12, 2021 and it has been fixed.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20203
But I do not know if this fix exists in systemd v249.3 (Arch
https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/pull/111 has not landed in a v249
point release yet. v249.3 was tagged 12 days ago; and that fix was only
merged 8 days ago.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:56 AM Amish wrote:
> Hello
>
> Further to my previous email:
>
> I see that there is already an
Hello
Further to my previous email:
I see that there is already an *extremely similar issue* reported on
July 12, 2021 and it has been fixed.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20203
But I do not know if this fix exists in systemd v249.3 (Arch Linux)
If it exists that means that fix
Hello,
Thank you for your reply.
I can understand that there can be race.
*But when I check logs, there is no race happening*.
*Let us see and analyze the logs.*
Stage 1:
System boots, and kernel assigns eth0, eth1 and eth2 as interface names.
Aug 18 09:17:13 kk kernel: e1000e :00:1f.6
Hiya,
As has been said, this is racy. "Sufficiently early" is just a hope,
rather than a guarantee. Perhaps something in the kernel made things
more or less efficient (try booting with the old kernel to see if it
helps, but as this is a race, it may only work some of the time.). Or
perhaps
On 16/08/21 5:39 pm, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mo, 16.08.21 17:31, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 16/08/21 5:25 pm, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mo, 16.08.21 16:09, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:
Some old scripts that we have expect interface names starting with eth. But
On Mo, 16.08.21 17:31, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 16/08/21 5:25 pm, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mo, 16.08.21 16:09, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Some old scripts that we have expect interface names starting with eth.
> > > But
> > > those names are not
On 16/08/21 5:25 pm, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mo, 16.08.21 16:09, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:
Some old scripts that we have expect interface names starting with eth. But
those names are not predictable.
So to get predictable names starting with eth*, first I temporarily rename
On Mo, 16.08.21 16:09, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Some old scripts that we have expect interface names starting with eth. But
> those names are not predictable.
>
> So to get predictable names starting with eth*, first I temporarily rename
> all interface with tmpeth*. This is done via
