Re: [systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

2015-06-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 01.06.15 08:25, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: Wouldn't that work? For dbus activation it would work but other services can still activate the service through systemd. But why is that a problem? If daemons explicitly request another service by invoking

Re: [systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

2015-06-01 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 28.05.15 13:56, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog

Re: [systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

2015-05-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: Hi, I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor

Re: [systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

2015-05-28 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog

Re: [systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

2015-05-28 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com wrote: On 28 May 2015 at 12:56, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog u...@tezduyar.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog

Re: [systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

2015-05-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 28.05.15 13:56, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering

Re: [systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

2015-05-27 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: Hi, I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked service? Well, so far our thinking was that if the vendor wants

Re: [systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

2015-05-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: Hi, I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked service? Well, so far our thinking was that if the vendor wants to make a unit completely unavailable he should simply not ship it in the first