Hi
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 16/08/2014 12:35, David Herrmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
this may be completely stupid, but if the only use case you have for
CONST_MAX() is for
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 5:35 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net
wrote:
On 15/08/2014 16:30, David Herrmann wrote:
Ok, took me a while, but I now figured out how to cause compilation to
fail even in
On Sat, 16.08.14 13:29, Daniele Nicolodi (dani...@grinta.net) wrote:
On 16/08/2014 12:35, David Herrmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net
wrote:
this may be completely stupid, but if the only use case you have for
CONST_MAX() is for computing
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 15/08/2014 16:30, David Herrmann wrote:
Ok, took me a while, but I now figured out how to cause compilation to
fail even in expressions that initialize types (_Static_assert is not
allowed there):
#define
On 16/08/2014 12:35, David Herrmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
this may be completely stupid, but if the only use case you have for
CONST_MAX() is for computing the size of a data structure, I find
something like
#define MAXSIZE(A, B)
Hi
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 18.07.14 16:02, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
1716f6dcf54d4c181c2e2558e3d5414f54c8d9ca (resolved: add LLMNR support
for looking up names) broke the build on clang.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:55 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 18.07.14 16:02, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
1716f6dcf54d4c181c2e2558e3d5414f54c8d9ca (resolved: add
On Fri, 15.08.14 10:55, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hm, I don't know whether that works. See the description here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.3/gcc/Other-Builtins.html
What you propose is something like my attached patch, I guess? Along
the lines of:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:55 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 18.07.14 16:02, Thomas H.P. Andersen
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 15.08.14 10:55, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hm, I don't know whether that works. See the description here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.3/gcc/Other-Builtins.html
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:55:57AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 18.07.14 16:02, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
1716f6dcf54d4c181c2e2558e3d5414f54c8d9ca (resolved: add LLMNR
On Fri, 15.08.14 11:49, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
If that still doesn't work, I guess we're left with your proposed
solution below, or we add MAX_CONST() which just does (A B)?A:B.
We could also just define MAX() differently if we detect we run on
LLVM. There must be some
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for trying!
Result is as I expected. Evaluation takes place _after_ validating
compile-time constants, and thus
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:35 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for trying!
Result is as I expected.
On Fri, 15.08.14 12:40, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:35 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, David Herrmann
On Fri, 15.08.14 13:00, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
src/resolve/resolved-dns-stream.c:67:43: error: non-const static data
member must be initialized out of line
uint8_t buffer[CMSG_SPACE(MAX(sizeof(struct
in_pktinfo), sizeof(struct in6_pktinfo)))
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 15.08.14 13:00, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
src/resolve/resolved-dns-stream.c:67:43: error: non-const static data
member must be initialized out of line
uint8_t
On Fri, 15.08.14 13:42, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 15.08.14 13:00, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
src/resolve/resolved-dns-stream.c:67:43: error: non-const
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 15.08.14 13:42, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 15.08.14 13:00, David Herrmann
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 15.08.14 13:42, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 15.08.14 13:00, David Herrmann
Hi
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
1716f6dcf54d4c181c2e2558e3d5414f54c8d9ca (resolved: add LLMNR support
for looking up names) broke the build on clang.
src/resolve/resolved-manager.c:553:43: error: non-const static data
member must be
On 15/08/2014 16:30, David Herrmann wrote:
Ok, took me a while, but I now figured out how to cause compilation to
fail even in expressions that initialize types (_Static_assert is not
allowed there):
#define assert_const(expr)
((void)(__builtin_types_compatible_p(int[(expr) ? 1 : -1],
On Fri, 15.08.14 17:22, Daniele Nicolodi (dani...@grinta.net) wrote:
On 15/08/2014 16:30, David Herrmann wrote:
Ok, took me a while, but I now figured out how to cause compilation to
fail even in expressions that initialize types (_Static_assert is not
allowed there):
#define
On Fri, 18.07.14 16:02, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
1716f6dcf54d4c181c2e2558e3d5414f54c8d9ca (resolved: add LLMNR support
for looking up names) broke the build on clang.
src/resolve/resolved-manager.c:553:43: error: non-const static data
member must be initialized out of
24 matches
Mail list logo
