Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Athletics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 6:25 PM Subject: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why? > Darkwing is dead. > > Garry Hill siphoned off the best of you with his attempt to attract more > readers to his magazine. A lot

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

If you aren't part of the solution you are part of the problem. Number of posts by Robbie Howell since Dec/01-9. Number of posts by Kim Spir since Dec/01-1. Kurt Bray wrote: > 1. This is list is exactly what the members make it. No one is going to do > it for you. If you want more results, pos

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

I have been on this list since shortly after it started in 1993 and have been a List Supervisor since the day the office was established. I agree that the list is much less vibrant now, but there is still enough going on here to keep >700 people subscribed. There are two things that are true a

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

Where do you suggest people go that are looking for that lost soul? I'm not being facetious. I'd like to know so I can bookmark it. Robert J Howell wrote: > > > Regardless of what Randy says, Kim has it right. This list has no soul, > no personality. It is only a shell of what it was. > > Robbi

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

I got onto this list in 1994, during the heyday of the "trash talking". If I had known what this list would become, I would have kept a tally of all of the runners, jumpers, and throwers that posted or lurked at one point or another. Anybody remember hearing from people like Steve Holman, Kevin S

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

Actually, gh promised speed and, while most web-based email programs are very slow, he delivered. On a DSL, it loads almost instantly. I periodically have to view it on a line that is only at about 24000 bps and it still loads reasonably fast unless the thread has got over 100 posts. If you want to

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

At 11:20 PM 10/12/2003 -0700, t-and-f-digest wrote: Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 21:20:42 EDT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why? Not dead... Dan K,Roger, Martin,Rich,Malmo, Ed, Cathy ,Mike and Michael are all regular contributions in which I often look forward to

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

>I miss Paul Houde, who once gave us a meet update from a parking lot >venue, CBC Montreal, and was it the world championships in what year? >Now, those heroics are not necessary. But he contributed to a community >that no longer exists here... http://www.radio-canada.ca/television/vedettes/artis

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

I miss Paul Houde, who once gave us a meet update from a parking lot venue, CBC Montreal, and was it the world championships in what year? Now, those heroics are not necessary. But he contributed to a community that no longer exists here... Kim Spir On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

Discussion about results on GP circuit stops in Brussels or Monaco never did grab the same audience as the college rabble-rowsers arguing who had a better XC "4th man"- Arkansas or Stanford. I'd say the collegians dominated the list about '94 to '96. Then elite IAAF track & field took over much of

Re: t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

Not dead... Dan K,Roger, Martin,Rich,Malmo, Ed, Cathy ,Mike and Michael are all regular contributions in which I often look forward to reading. And I can always find John Lunn lurking. Thanks In a message dated 10/12/2003 6:10:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Darkwing is dead. > >Garry

t-and-f: dynamite the bridge. Why?

Darkwing is dead. Garry Hill siphoned off the best of you with his attempt to attract more readers to his magazine. A lot of people, apparently, are buying into this forum of large, long, ludicrous and loud dialogue that he now commands. Garry Hill now corners the youth and collegiate email opinio