What a wacky idea...I proposed a few years back that we make the likes of
Machuka and Hanneck citizens, they were road kings for a while. Turns out
Hanneck is now, but he's not the same guy. Who needs to, though, when we
have a new American Record marathon from Special K, and 2 young new sub-28
The presence of money, by itself, is not the problem.
But the hugely inequitable distribution of money might be.
There is just too much of a disparity between what is
distributed to a semi-finalist versus what is distributed
to a finalist, and even a worse disparity between what
1st place gets
I think this thread has a dangerous assumption, that is not true. "People
run mainly for the money."
Even if we are to accept the cheating, it is about winning. The money has
come and is coming, but the objective is to win. People cheat to win in this
sport. In the times of the East German
A flattened prize distribution like golf would change everything.
malmo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R.T.
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: $ not the
There was plenty of money back then.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: $ not the root of all evil.
I
The G.O.A.T. says:
"...People cheat to win in this
sport. In the times of the East German regime, it was about winning.
There
was very little money, especially going to the athlete.
People cheat to win. Money has been a result not a cause."
Correct. People would cheat to win, especially
How about a "per capita" award structure? In other words, the inner of the NY
Marathon gets a precentage of the average yearly per capita income of his or
her country, w/ lower places getting smaller percentages. Thus, if some guy
from the US wins he takes home $50,000; if he's from Ethiopia,
This just means there would be no-one left running for most third world
countries. Anyone approaching elite status would just take out US (etc)
citizenship..
I reckon I'd be rushing to the Brunei or Gulf states embassies myself...
Regards - GT - http://homepages.go.com/~oztrack/
-Original
In a message dated 11/6/00 7:22:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This just means there would be no-one left running for most third world
countries. Anyone approaching elite status would just take out US (etc)
citizenship..
Well, that's one way to end the US distance drought ;-)
Jim Gerweck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of THOMAS,Graham
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: t-and-f: $ not the root of all evil.
This just means there would be no-one left running for most third
10 matches
Mail list logo