1)
Where did McChesney run the 29:06.8? Junior Nats? Senior Nats?
I think it was in an open meet in Eugene.
Where was Hulst's 28:55.0 run? I heard it was run on a sub-standard track.
Anyone?
2)
For those of you who believe in "Purdy-style" equivalent charts, a 28:32 is
far superior to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t-and-f: Re: unreal 10K times (was: HS records
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 15:39:17 EDT
In a message dated Wed, 4 Apr 2001 3:04:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Richard McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hulst's was second
In a message dated 4/4/01 12:52:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where did McChesney run the 29:06.8? Junior Nats? Senior Nats?
I think it was in an open meet in Eugene.
Where was Hulst's 28:55.0 run? I heard it was run on a sub-standard track.
McChesney's 29:06.8 was for 3rd at the
(and in a post several months back I posited that I thought/think that
the track itself was short as a 440y oval to begin with, but that's another
matter).
In light of these types of "shortcomings" ... Is every track, where a record
of any importance is broken (AR, WR, NR), ALWAYS known to be
