PROTECTED]
Reply-To: P N Heidenstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:40:25 +1300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t-and-f: Pseudo-techno-crap
I'm glad to be able to post Mr Norton's email as he
suggests.
P N H
==
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X
What's funny about this post is that it would have been more effective
if it would have stopped with point number 1. Instead, it started a bit
of a discussion about starts which is clearly part of the list charter.
And Ben managed to get back on to the list again...
Regards,
Martin
P N
[en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,x-ns1ZHJFQ0M9Nh4,x-ns2Vb60bt0F638,ko
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t-and-f: Pseudo-techno-crap
Dear Mr. Heidenstrom,
A couple of points in response to your post on the track list.
http://www.mail-archive.com/t-and-f%40lists.uoregon.edu/msg21369.html
I am
1. This is a commercial advertisement and as such is
expessely forbidden by this list charter. Mr Entine has
sailed near the wind and been roundly condemned by
many on this list (while Mr Scott Davis has clearly
infringed and continues to get away with it.) But this is
blatant touting for
--- P N Heidenstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The greatest sprinter of all time (in terms of records as well
as world and Olympic titles) was Carl Lewis - consistently
a far slower starter than his opponents. Did he worry about
that failing (if it was a failing?). Has anyone ever speculated
on
