They clearly have too much time on their hands. I wonder if he is going to
talk
to her like a father too.
Sure, why not? Talking to Marion Jones like a father apparently worked.
;-)
Kurt Bray
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protectio
ir eyes?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilmar Kortleever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:21 AM
> Cc: Post, Marty; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] uoregon. edu' (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: Radcliffe's marathon pacing slammed by IAAF
>
> &qu
he next one
goes to 30km and fourth pacer starts there and goes to the finish) would
this be "legal" in their eyes?
-Original Message-
From: Wilmar Kortleever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:21 AM
Cc: Post, Marty; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] uoregon. edu' (E-
They clearly have too much time on their hands. I wonder if he is going to talk
to her like a father too. Mountains and molehills come to mind here. John Q
Public certainly won't care and the "crisis" is solved by just having a joint
start. Why not weigh in on the pole vault rule changes instead?
R
>From the The Guardian Unlimited on-line:
"If Paula Radcliffe sets a world record using male pacemakers in the London
Marathon next month it will almost certainly not be officially recognised, a
senior figure in the sport's governing body warned last night.
Istvan Gyulai, secretary of the Intern
