on 14/12/00 19:56, Mcewen, Brian T at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't the EGR men have had the same excellent coaches and physios? He
wasn't asking why the German women were so good but why there were not
similar astounding, long-lasting WR's run by East German men.
Seems fairly
Randall writes:
on 14/12/00 19:56, Mcewen, Brian T at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't the EGR men have had the same excellent coaches and physios?
He
wasn't asking why the German women were so good but why there were
not
similar astounding, long-lasting WR's run by East German
Netters
Brian wrote:
Wouldn't the EGR men have had the same excellent coaches and physios? He
wasn't asking why the German women were so good but why there were not
similar astounding, long-lasting WR's run by East German men.
A side note here. There were some incredible coaches on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Netters
Brian wrote:
Wouldn't the EGR men have had the same excellent coaches and physios? He
wasn't asking why the German women were so good but why there were not
similar astounding, long-lasting WR's run by East German men.
A side note here. There
Kurt wrote:
Seems fairly obvious that men's athletics in other countries was a lot
more
advanced than women's athletics. Therefore it was easier to make larger
advances in women's athletics.
There are biological reasons too. Most of the doping in the East German
era
was steroid-based,
1) Can someone define this post for me, it is gibberish!
2) Tainted records is not a joke but a documented fact. The German regime is not a rumor any longer, but has been proven and admitted to.
As for your tangent concerning training techniques, as a sprint coach I do not know what you are
