Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

-- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:35:06 EDT Subject: Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ah, maybe his REAL goal was that all-important, very meaningful 1600m record, which they'll really

Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 09:32:53 EDT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile With Ryan running 3:55.3 for the 1 Mile, any 1600 record is obsolete. That's 3:53.7 for 1600 for Ryan. 3:53.7!!! Anything over that mark

t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

In a message dated 4/15/01 4:17:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Alan Webb (Virginia) 4:01.81 (and 3:59.50 Nat'l Federation 1600 record auto-timed along the way) Is it any wonder that most track fans don't put much stock in Nat'l Federation H.S. Records? While Webb's 3:59.50 may be the

Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

In a message dated 4/15/01 4:17:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Alan Webb (Virginia) 4:01.81 (and 3:59.50 Nat'l Federation 1600 record auto-timed along the way) Pardon me if I've missed something, but was Webb tieing up badly in the last 10 meters? At 4:00 minute pace he should

Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

Dave Johnson wrote: Pardon me if I've missed something, but was Webb tieing up badly in the last 10 meters? At 4:00 minute pace he should have covered the last 9.35 meters in about 1.4 seconds. In this race he covered the distance in 2.31 seconds. Which would be over 6:30 pace. We've

RE: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

Yeah, 6:34 pace? Usually we have to wait until the last weekend of April to witness that kind of 'rig' -- the boys 4 x 400 at the Penn Relays. I'd bet it was the fingers of the zealous timers that tied-up from 'going out too hard', not Webb. malmo Pardon me if I've missed something, but was

Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

In a message dated 4/15/01 6:04:59 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd bet it was the fingers of the zealous timers that tied-up from 'going out too hard', not Webb. I timed the 1600 with Finish Lynx on our backup camera. Webb was in total control of the race and was

RE: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 7:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile In a message dated 4/15/01 6:04:59 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd bet

Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

I will defer to Don after my first post. He was in a much better position to see what was actually happening. I was way up in the announcer's booth about 50 meters from the finish. From my perspective, Webb looked like he was tying up a bit but it is true that the race was clearly in hand.

Re: t-and-f: Webb 4:01.81-1600/mile

He was! Scott