>Los Angeles has made a bid to host the summer Olympic Games in 2012. A
>private bid consortium said it would need to build only one new permanent
>facility to host the event for what would be the third time.
>
>Eamonn Condon
>WWW.RunnersGoal.com
>
That one brand new facility would be for gun-sho
a site that i came across recently (note: i am in *no* way affiliated with it) that i
thought might be of interest:
http://home.mmcable.com/snbmct/
==
"They'll speak our names in hushed tones, 'those guys are animals' they'll
say! We can lay it on the line, bust a gut, show them a clean
Dan I understand your point, as I understand Conway's. But the truth is what it is, just as you say the event is what it is. Very rare is there a 200 runner that cannot excel at either the 100 or 400. The requirements needed to be a world class 200 m runner are borne out of the short and long.
Koch, why is it that the men had on sprint award? Who makes the call on what awards are given out?
The G.O.A.T.
In a message dated 12/6/00 2:45:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And sprints has a men's and women's. And within the men's, it is broken
down into each event within the sprints, i.e.. 100m, 200m, 400m.
I do not know if this is correct. I know on the AAC side of things it
I see your point, but I disagree on a fundamental basis. I do not see these specialist you named improving because they were specialist. Most of the people on your specialist list ran at a time when the 200 was a regularly contested event.
In other words they did all they could do and that is why
Los Angeles has made a bid to host the summer Olympic Games in 2012. A
private bid consortium said it would need to build only one new permanent
facility to host the event for what would be the third time.
Eamonn Condon
WWW.RunnersGoal.com
Darrell, I think your reasoning is a bit circular on this. Any time you
have three consecutive events, anyone who's best event is the middle one
is going to be better or worse at the longer one vs. the shorter one. To
say this means they should really be in the bookend event seems a bit
silly on
In a message dated 11/30/00 9:16:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heard Baltimore Armory as site. Brand new Monad track.
The 2001 Nike Indoor Classic will be held March 10-11 in the new Prince George's Sports and Learning Complex in Landover, MD. It will seat 3000, has a
Death of Tom Mcdermott, reported by Kevin McGill
former Throws Coach, Southern Connecticut State College
Thank you Kevin for the sad news. I did not know he had passed. What a
fine and wonderful man, full of humor and life. His great personal
contributions were his feedback to me on what my th
Barbara Kousky has asked me to post this to the tracklist:
>X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 6 14:33:07 2000
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2
>Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:15:04 -0800
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Barbara Kousky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And sprints has a men's and women's. And within the men's, it is broken
down into each event within the sprints, i.e.. 100m, 200m, 400m.
-Original Message-
From: bobhersh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 2:05 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Conw
In a recent post to several e-groups and individuals, Ken Stone alluded to
a "series of steps" which Sacramento (and any other interested city in the
world) would need to follow in order to be considered for as a bona fide
candidate to host the WAVA World Veterans' Athletics Championships.
For
Anybody know the TV schedule (if any) for televising the Foot Locker finals
this weekend?
JT
Message text written by "Fred Finke"
>I am a little curious as to the statement that LDR has three running
committees. What are you talking about? I am only aware of one men's LDR
committee.<
There's also a Women's LDR Committee and a Masters LDR Committee. That
makes three.
Darrell wrote:
A valid argument, but based on some misconception Conway.
Many of the young men you deem 200 specialist are not, actually I can
think of none. The best furlong runners have been one or the other,
no real specialist. If you find someone specializing in the 200, it is
A valid argument, but based on some misconception Conway.
Many of the young men you deem 200 specialist are not, actually I can think of none. The best furlong runners have been one or the other, no real specialist.
If you find someone specializing in the 200, it is pretty easy to discern which ca
I am a
little curious as to the statement that LDR has three running committees.
What are you talking about? I am only aware of one men's LDR
committee.
Fred
Finke
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of ConwaySent: Wednesday, De
Darrell wrote:
Conway you bring up a good point that can be easily
answered. As a sprinter you either a 100 or 400 runner. This
makes the 200 m a bastard event. The 200 star has always been one or
the other, or live in obscurity. Economics has dictated this recently, but
the
Justin wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> Conway wrote:
>
> > I noticed that for the upcoming season, the 100 and 400 are the Grand
Prix
> > events with the 200 again out in the cold .. Is it my imagination or has
> > the
> > quality of the 200 been dropping (Olympic years excepted) since the
Grand
> > Prix h
Darrell wrote:But we find ourselves in a time where subjectivity is
pervasive! Winning gold medals, and setting world records is no longer
criteria for receiving awards, if the people behind the mirror do not like
you, or your affiliations. This is far worse than awarding stars, and
career
In a message dated 12/6/00 1:37:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Those supporting the proposal felt the opportunity to bring this
championship
>
> to the US was so great that we would be injudicious not to make this bid.
> The benefits to US Track & Field would be
Greetings, all:
Give George Mathews credit. He's pretty quick off the mark for a hammer
thrower. Here's his rundown on the status of the USA bid for the 2005 World
Veterans Athletic Championships:
STATUS REPORT ON THE PRESENTATION SACRAMENTO WAVA CHAMPIONSHIPS
FOR 2005
BY: GEORGE MATHEWS 1
Hi All
Conway wrote:
> I noticed that for the upcoming season, the 100 and 400 are the Grand Prix
> events with the 200 again out in the cold .. Is it my imagination or has
> the
> quality of the 200 been dropping (Olympic years excepted) since the Grand
> Prix has begun to focus so much attent
In a message dated 12/6/00 8:05:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only sure way to get your proper due is to win your event(s) and get your medals .. Otherwise subjectivity will leave you out in the cold ..
But we find ourselves in a time where subjectivity is pervasi
Conway you bring up a good point that can be easily answered. As a sprinter you either a 100 or 400 runner. This makes the 200 m a bastard event. The 200 star has always been one or the other, or live in obscurity.
Economics has dictated this recently, but the sport itself has defined this pheno
I noticed that for the upcoming season, the 100 and 400 are the Grand Prix
events with the 200 again out in the cold .. Is it my imagination or has the
quality of the 200 been dropping (Olympic years excepted) since the Grand
Prix has begun to focus so much attention on just the 100/400 ?? The
sea
Darrell wrote:
On USATF site they have posted the award winners from the
breakfast at the conference. Reading the list raised a few questions
and concerns. The most obvious being, how do we justify giving the
outstanding sprint award to MJ? And what is the definition of
developmental whe
28 matches
Mail list logo