RE: t-and-f: ChampionChip Timing systems (was European Cross Coun try Champs)

2001-12-17 Thread DLTFNedit
In a message dated Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:20:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, Mcewen, Brian T [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rather than have a 5 x 2k multi-loop setup for NCAA's that (in my opinion) turns it into a track race on grass, I don't see why they couldn't have sensors set up at 4k/6k/8k or

RE: t-and-f: ChampionChip Timing systems (was European Cross Coun try Champs)

2001-12-17 Thread Mcewen, Brian T
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: t-and-f: ChampionChip Timing systems (was European Cross Coun try Champs) In a message dated Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:20:39 AM Eastern Standard Time

Re: t-and-f: ChampionChip Timing systems (was European Cross Coun try Champs)

2001-12-17 Thread JimRTimes
In a message dated 12/17/01 3:58:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hell, the last split you get is 1.1 to 1.2 miles from the finish! Not if the organizers are smart, and give metric splits for metric distance races. Jim Gerweck Running Times

RE: t-and-f: ChampionChip Timing systems (was European Cross Coun try Champs)

2001-12-17 Thread DLTFNedit
Brian- I understand your points, but they are based on the experience for the competitors, when what we should be most concerned about is the experience for the spectators. We have no problems concerning the participatory side of the sport in this country, but when it comes to presentation and

Re: t-and-f: ChampionChip Timing systems (was European Cross Coun try Champs)

2001-12-17 Thread Wayne T. Armbrust
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 12/17/01 3:58:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hell, the last split you get is 1.1 to 1.2 miles from the finish! Not if the organizers are smart, and give metric splits for metric distance races. Not too many are smart. Most are still trying