Excellent live updates on Runnersworld.com from the Chicago Marathon...
According to RW, Khannouchi notched yet another sub-2:06,
come-from-behind win, crossing the line in 2:05:55 (4th-fastest ever).
Culpepper is reported to have broken 2:10.
In the women's race, Radcliffe won in
I can't imagine any scenario in which Radcliffe doesn't win AOY now.
--
Lee Nichols
Assistant News Editor
The Austin Chronicle
512/454-5766 ext. 138
fax 512/458-6910
http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/authors/leenichols.html
I say once again...Paula Radcliffe, Athlete of the Year!
bob
Ok gh I assume AOY is NOW a slam dunk.
Regards,
Martin
miscott wrote:
Excellent live updates on Runnersworld.com from the Chicago Marathon...
According to RW, Khannouchi notched yet another sub-2:06,
come-from-behind win, crossing the line in 2:05:55 (4th-fastest ever).
Culpepper is
The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon MAR: Top 10 Athletes
overall first_names last_name citystate country age sex clockfinal
chipfinal overdiv oversex split_15k halfsplit_30k
1 Khalid Khannouchi 30 M 02:05:5602:05:561 1 0:44:23
1:02:12
2 Daniel Njenga JPN
Okay, so the question of the day is for Garry Hill. Do you still think
that Paula is undeserving of AOY honors?
Tony Banovich
Billings, Montana
The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon MAR: Top 10 Women Athletes
overall first_names last_name citystate country age sex clockfinal
chipfinal overdiv oversex split_15k halfsplit_30k
22 Paula Radcliffe GBR 28 F 02:17:1802:17:181 1 0:49:06
1:08:43
28 Catherine
Contact:Jill M. Geer
Director of Communications
(316) 261-0500 x360
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.usatf.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Sunday, October 13, 2003
Radcliffe breaks WR; Khannouchi wins at Chicago
CHICAGO Each
on 10/13/02 8:35, Tony Banovich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so the question of the day is for Garry Hill. Do you still think
that Paula is undeserving of AOY honors?
The tough question now is, which of her marks is the POY? I lean towards the
10K myself.
gh
U.S. ATHLETE QUOTES 25th LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon
Sunday, October 13, 2002
Men
KHALID KHANNOUCHI, 1st, 2:05:56: This is a magical place. When you come
here, you know youre going to compete against the best. I was emotional
because you dont imagine how many times I heard my name. It
That marathon time is equivalent to a 29:28(26:02 male) effort however which is
just under the WR. Based on this from Wejo, she has more in her:
As the above splits indicate, their 23rd mile was slow. When Weldon told her it
was 5:22 (he was looking at his watch a second ahead). She said, What?
Netters:
Since I don;t get the Times on a daily basis, I had missed Frank
Litsky's obit on Ben Eastman, but will get to the library pronto to read it.
Eastman;s absence from the Hall of Fame is certainly a big boo-boo,
but noty the only one. At least two New Jersey athletes
I thought somebody said Meb was gonna run Chicago.
Anybody know if he started or not, and how the day went
for him?
RT
Looking at the Chicago results, virtually every person outside the top ten,
including names like Kimondiu, de la Cerda, Dowling, Cox, and Shay, had gun
times that were 20-25 seconds slower than their chip times.
I've seen pictures of the Boston start, and heard similar stories from New
York,
I believe the RUMOR was NYC for MEB.
malmo
only approved rumors get past me
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Men: Top 10 Chicago Make
Looking at the Chicago results, virtually every person outside the top ten,
including names like Kimondiu, de la Cerda, Dowling, Cox, and Shay, had gun
times that were 20-25 seconds slower than their chip times.
I've seen pictures of the Boston start, and heard similar stories from New
Culpepper too!
Think outside of the chip. You're looking for a logical answer. There
is none. Your computer screen goes blue and doesn't work sometimes,
right? Chips in there. No answers. No sense in looking for one either.
Shrimp Plate $1.99
malmo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
on 10/13/02 14:08, malmo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your computer screen goes blue and doesn't work sometimes,
right?
Not if you have a Mac :-)
gh
on 10/13/02 10:35, Martin J. Dixon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That marathon time is equivalent to a 29:28(26:02 male) effort however which
is
just under the WR.
Says who? Given the relatively new nature of each event on the international
front, and the incertitude of the value of various
Culpepper refers to breaking Salazar's American debut record at Chicago
below. Actually he ran the same exact time as Salazar did at New York City
in 1980. However, NYC has always been considered a point-to-point aided
course (as opposed to Chicago loop course), and, perhaps more significantly,
I completely agree with gh that strict comparisons are not accurate and in
fact I would dismiss male-female comparison charts the same way I dismiss
using age grading tables for absolute type comparisons at the elite level
(they are great for more low-key stuff). But I have always believed that
on 10/13/02 10:35, Martin J. Dixon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That marathon time is equivalent to a 29:28(26:02 male) effort however which
is
just under the WR.
Says who? Given the relatively new nature of each event on the international
front, and the incertitude of the value of
I'm sorry that I didn't learn about Ben Eastman's existence until after he
was already dead. I would like to know more about his races.
Did he simultaneously hold world records for the 400 m and 800 m?
He apparently ran a world record 46.4 for the 400 m at Palo Alto on March 26,
1932 (although
Remember Edmonton? KK sounds (or has sounded) like he very much wants to
represent the US internationally, but I'm not sure how fond he is of
championship racing after his last WC attempt...
Dan
--- jim mclatchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Khannouchi has proved numerous times (sic) that he can
24 matches
Mail list logo