2009/10/13 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2009/10/13 Gilles Corlobé gil...@corlobe.tk:
Hello everybody,
I propose to add a tag boundary=military : the problem is that, with the
existing tags, it's almost impossible to mark correctly lots of data, like
(non limitative list)
2009/10/13 lulu-...@gmx.de:
I would love to agree, but the needs of disabled persons are widely spread
over our tagging scheme anyway, and awareness of objects that refer to
accessibility is nearly zero.
There are categories for visual, hearing and walking impariment, colletcted
in the
2009/10/13 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
IMHO landuse=military is already what you want to express with
boundary=military.
Then all the landuse=military tags can be changed, and
landuse=military can be deprecated.
On the other hand, ownership=military and/or access=military makes
TIGER obfuscates the data by declaring the entire numbering range of a
zone: for example a 400 block / Even containing houses 404 through 420
would be declared as range Even / 400-498 in TIGER. For navigation
purposes, that gets you to within one block of an address.
Maybe they do it for
actually I think that instead of discussing interpolation with
regularlyskipped numbers you could map explicitly the nodes of the
real numbers, thus getting a high-precision map instead of this
interpolation-crab, that is much less useful then an actual accurate
position ;-)
just my 2 cents.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:26 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/10/14 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
Ok, so my big question is:
Why are your property boundaries rendered with solid fill?
Its not indicating land use, and should be rendered as a
