Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskippednumbers

2009-10-15 Thread Randy Thomson
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: actually I think that instead of discussing interpolation with regularlyskipped numbers you could map explicitly the nodes of the real numbers, thus getting a high-precision map instead of this interpolation-crab, that is much less useful then an actual accurate

Re: [Tagging] Best practice regarding addr:housenumber and POIs

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Childs
2009/10/15 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com: Hi I'm wondering what is best practice regarding tagging addr:housenumber and POIs, e.g. amenity=restaurant. Let's assume that on Mainstreet 10 there's a restaurant named Thai Wok. Should there be one node or two? One single node with

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskippednumbers

2009-10-15 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Randy Thomson rwtnospam-...@yahoo.com wrote: Sounds good Martin. I have about 3000-5000 houses to tag, I'll tag the beginning and ending house addresses, on each street, if you'll tag the 15-20 individual houses in between. They're in the satellite images, so

Re: [Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

2009-10-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/10/14 sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org: In the holes continuity, it as been proposed that an area representing something inside another area would still be part of a multipolygon relation but with it's own tags. no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT

Re: [Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

2009-10-15 Thread Dave F.
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: well, even in the case lake inside a forest I'm not sure, if the forest stops where there is the lake. Probably you can consider the lake also part of the forest (when it's small), or to give a different example: elementary school inside a residential area. Usually

Re: [Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

2009-10-15 Thread sly (sylvain letuffe)
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT part of the outer polygon. I didn't say that ;-) I said : an area representing something inside another area would still be part of a multipolygon relation (I assumed

Re: [Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

2009-10-15 Thread sly (sylvain letuffe)
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: For the lake in the forest: do you agree that someone would say: the lake (pond) is in the forest? Like a way in the forest, which doesn't have trees growing on it, but still is in the forest. It is not excluded. That's a human language

Re: [Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

2009-10-15 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: Anthony wrote: What happens when there's a section of forest which people are using as their residence? No matter what the size, I see these as mutually exclusive. In other words they can't both occur in the same place.