On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer Generally, I
don't think it's acceptable to change the definitions of
tags in this way.
+1
+1 (although my recent edits against noexit=no)
I also wonder how we should deal with this specific situation. Can we
still assume any default
2009/11/27 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
no, IMHO we shouldn't generally imply but tag explicitly, otherwise
consistency is at risk.
no, if we don't have defaults, we will have to populate 20, 30 or 50
attributs on each highway in the future.
come on, I wonder where those 50 attributes should
2009/11/27 Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
no, IMHO we shouldn't generally imply but tag explicitly, otherwise
consistency is at risk.
If the tags implied by another tag were documented in a standard form,
in a central place (so any application,
Alessandro Rubini wrote:
I don't think there are road types that are inherently one-way, besides
roundabouts.
This is a two-way motorway link, for example:
http://maps.google.it/?ie=UTF8ll=45.249774,9.044243spn=0.002761,0.004914t=kz=18
It is indeed, but my guess is that it's an exception,
On 11/27/09, Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
Alessandro Rubini wrote:
This is a two-way motorway link, for example:
[...]
It is indeed, but my guess is that it's an exception, and not the
normal.
It is not: most motorway links in italy are made of both one-way and
Hi,
...
there is an update of this site:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=protected_area
r.t.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
It will be great to see what you recommend. I haven't made a final decision,
nor really talked to the talk-ca list about what the 'National Protected
Areas' database that is (going to) be ready for import in Canada.
I have a sample
How do you set the direction for one-way without explicitly defining it?
Dave F.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Tobias Knerr wrote:
Should an application developer decide to assume oneway=no (which might
lead to longer-than-optimal routing results) or oneway=yes (which might
send you the wrong way up a trunk link)?
I would prefer one-way to never be assumed as yes, even on motorways,
for consistency's
Liz wrote:
and when the comment in the history from 21 June is read it says
(This won't break any ways, because 1. nobody (approximately) uses this for
routing yet, 2. assuming they're 2-way in a routing app is potentially
dangerous anyway.)
2 never applies in practice, especially outside
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
It also means that newcomers may not quite
get the tagging right, because they assume that a road type which is
inherently one-way doesn't need explicit tagging.
Name one road type which is inherently one-way.
___
Tagging
Dave F. wrote:
How do you set the direction for one-way without explicitly defining it?
Dave F.
Ahh! disregard please - I answered it myself.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
I should probably point out that not all roundabouts are one-way.
I'm waiting an example.
Definition of roundabout:
A roundabout is one of several types of circular road junctions or
intersections at which traffic is
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Paul Johnson wrote:
I should probably point out that not all roundabouts are one-way.
That's a traffic circle
I have researched this point..
Liz
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
