On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:06 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Imagine a mechanism in your favourite editor when you can drag the
width of the node outwards to match the width of the road, this then
gets stored against the node information for the way.
Ah ok. Hmm, I'd prefer that
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:06 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Imagine a mechanism in your favourite editor when you can drag the
width of the node outwards to match the width of the road, this then
gets
On 5 February 2010 06:13, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
But it seems like you're suggesting that the OSM way instead should represent:
a) if a oneway feature: the centerline
b) if a twoway feature: the divider between traffic travelling in each
direction
I already map the node at
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/2/3 Chango640 chango...@gmail.com:
If you are interested in this proposal, please visit
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gated_community to
see
full details and discuss.
Why not use
On 5 February 2010 15:00, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I edited the page 'image'
feel free to fix / edit/ delete
There seems to be a number of URL type tags, is there a need for a
specific image tag? Wouldn't it be better to unify these?
eg
URI:image=*
URI:wikipedia=*
Sure, the OSM poi KML script can handle all variations.
The point is, is to find 1 that people are happy with, and market it
out there to all the 'map editoring tools' so they all will support
it.
osv:url=http:// .jpg is another one.
When people are out there 'photo mapping' why not share
