Re: [Tagging] source:geolocation?

2010-02-24 Thread Liz
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Roy Wallace wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:40 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: Pick which ever has the most widespread use and document it. Hmm now that I check again, [1] lists a few hundred uses of source:position, but only 2 uses of source:location.

Re: [Tagging] source:geolocation?

2010-02-24 Thread Steve Bennett
Not sure of the difference, but OSMdoc is easy to use. http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/source%3Alocation/#values source:location 8 entries http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/source%3Aposition/#values source:position 12380 entries, but all but 80 or so are from two imports. Steve

Re: [Tagging] source:geolocation?

2010-02-24 Thread Stephen Hope
It's great, but unfortunately the data is out of date (or from somewhere else). Try looking for source=nearmap , as an example. It doesn't have any, and I know of hundreds just in my area. I think it's undergoing redevelopment at the moment. Stephen On 25 February 2010 07:45, Steve Bennett