Hello,
I moved old orphanage draft to RFC, feel free to comment.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Orphanage
Regards,
Paweł Marynowski
User:Yarl
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2010/5/27 y...@o2.pl y...@o2.pl:
I moved old orphanage draft to RFC, feel free to comment.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Orphanage
Can we use some other key instead of yet another amenity=*?
In fact there is so many amenities we should perhaps think about
splitting them
2010/5/27 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Can we use some other key instead of yet another amenity=*?
In fact there is so many amenities we should perhaps think about
splitting them off into other categories...
Sounds like a good idea.
There is also another proposal: residental home
I agree with Pawel. I'd prefer 'residential home' with residents=children
I think use of the word Orphanage has nearly disapeared in the UK because
the word means children have permanently lost their parents, but many of
children in 'children's homes' may only be there for a short period while
Here is another try for world wide standardisation of places in order to
hopefully try to create a consistent database and not a renderer work around
font label positionning system
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/world_wide_place_default_standardisation
fake quote of the
2010/5/27 y...@o2.pl y...@o2.pl
2010/5/27 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
In fact there is so many amenities we should perhaps think about
splitting them off into other categories...
Sounds like a good idea.
No. The amount of values should not influence the key. The question is
In the USA, the definition varies from state to state. For example, Tennessee
(where I live) does not have an official definition of town vs. city, and every
town or city is contained within a county. In Virginia, towns are contained
within counties, and subordinate to them; cities are
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:28 AM, sly (sylvain letuffe)
li...@letuffe.org wrote:
Here is another try for world wide standardisation of places in order to
hopefully try to create a consistent database
I like your motivation. But maybe it's not necessary. Using
population=* achieves the same
Roy Wallace waldo000...@... writes:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:28 AM, sly (sylvain letuffe)
li...@... wrote:
Here is another try for world wide standardisation of places in order to
hopefully try to create a consistent database
I like your motivation. But maybe it's not necessary.
On 27/05/2010 22:09, Liz wrote:
rest area has been redirected to highway=services with a note to a Wikipedia
entry.
The wikipedia entry is huge and after much scrolling down the page it becomes
quite obvious that Rest Area has many meanings on highways worldwide.
While highway=services is
In Tennessee, USA, where I live, the Interstates (motorways) both parking
areas (no services other than a place to park temporarily) and rest areas
(with parking, rest rooms, soft drink/candy machines, and frequently local
tourist-information pamphlets. They may or may not have an attendant on
On 28 May 2010 01:10, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/5/27 y...@o2.pl y...@o2.pl
2010/5/27 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
In fact there is so many amenities we should perhaps think about
splitting them off into other categories...
Sounds like a good idea.
No. The amount of
On 28 May 2010 10:19, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
In Tennessee, USA, where I live, the Interstates (motorways) both parking
areas (no services other than a place to park temporarily) and rest areas
(with parking, rest rooms, soft drink/candy machines, and frequently local
On 28 May 2010 01:30, Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com wrote:
population-based. A region center in a non-urban area may be
That just means we need place=regional_centre to render similar to
place=city, currently places in Australia need this rendering, they
may be small towns both in area and
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Andrew wynnd...@lavabit.com wrote:
I like your motivation. But maybe it's not necessary. Using
population=* achieves the same goal.
There are two serious flaws with using  population=*. The first is that you
have
to put in populations for absolutely
2010/5/27 y...@o2.pl y...@o2.pl:
Sounds like a good idea.
There is also another proposal: residental home
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Residential_home)
with tagging amenity=residential_home +
residents=childen/veterans/disabled/etc. Maybe we should merge these
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
How about:
landuse=residential
residential=childrens_home
The benefit of two-tiered tags like this is renderers (and other
tools) only need to support landuse=residential to get something
that's approximately right.
17 matches
Mail list logo
