We have been recently discussing on the German ML about
landuse=residential. In Germany many mappers were mapping subdivisions
/ neighbourhoods [1] with landuse=residential. This led to very rough
landuse information, because in order to keep the (sometimes quite
big) area as a whole they are
2011/8/29 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
We have been recently discussing on the German ML about
landuse=residential. In Germany many mappers were mapping subdivisions
/ neighbourhoods [1] with landuse=residential. This led to very rough
landuse information, because in order to
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
We have been recently discussing on the German ML about
landuse=residential. In Germany many mappers were mapping subdivisions
/ neighbourhoods [1] with landuse=residential. This led to very rough
landuse
Landuse is a general description of what the predominant landuse is.
Hence if a residential subdivision includes a community park or golf
course, or an industrial park includes a McDonald's, you don't need to
cut them out of the polygon.
As for including roads, I tend to include them if
On 29/08/2011 23:35, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/29/2011 6:05 PM, Dave F. wrote:
Mapping the difference between a
residential estate a golf course is, IMO, the bare minimum.
Here's an example of a residential community (Bay Hill) that has a
golf course within it:
