2011/9/28 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/27/2011 8:26 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
How? What's wrong with all of the sub-Manhattan entities being
place=neighborhood?
not sure if there is something wrong there, so you could (as local
mapper) decide to do it like this. In other
Martin, I'm not sure the NYC example is helping. You mentioned this was
discussed on the German mailing list--can you give some other examples from
Germany (or whereever) about how this might be used? Thanks, Brad
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
2011/9/22 Kytömaa Lauri lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi:
Sorry if I raise the discussion again but our documentation about
lanes still doesn't clarify our position on how we count lanes (e.g.
psv lanes) and turning lanes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
(3) Few days back there were, globally,
Pieren wrote:
Am I the only one who think that the turnlanes plugin is splendid
but unworkable for average contributors, reserved to one editor
(JOSM) and resulting data (relations) obscure/opaque/cryptic
for humans ?
No, you're certainly not the only person who thinks that!
cheers
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/27/2011 4:57 PM, Gérard wrote:
Given that studies disagree about what makes a street safe for cyclists, any
tagging would be based not on safety but on how
On 9/28/2011 12:08 PM, Josh Doe wrote:
Width of outside lane (no tags for this AFAIK)
Shoulder details (width, surface: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder)
This only applies if you ride as far right as possible. It's safer to
ride in the middle of the right lane, and causes little
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/28/2011 12:08 PM, Josh Doe wrote:
Width of outside lane (no tags for this AFAIK)
Shoulder details (width, surface:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder)
This only applies if you ride as far right as possible. It's safer to
ride in
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
Unfortunately this is true. What's needed is to document the objective
facts
Then we can delete the keys smoothness , sac_scale, mtb:scale
and tracktype. But, oh no, they seem to be widely used. Perhaps
because they summarize in
This discussion has happened before. I guess it will happen again.
The argument that more hard-core riders can't judge the bicycle
friendliness of a road is ridiculous. Any bicycle friendliness tags
will obviously be targeted at average commuting cyclists. The fact
that *I* ride along a road
On 9/28/2011 2:13 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
But people
who are intereseted in cycling can (and have) easily add a single tag
and get some basic data into the system.
I can accept this. But don't call it safety, since it's not. Call it
something that makes it clear that it's about how comfortable
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/28/2011 2:13 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
But people
who are intereseted in cycling can (and have) easily add a single
tag
and get some basic data into the system.
I can accept this. But don't call it safety, since it's not. Call it
something
What is our recommendation for tagging the access roads entering or
leaving motorway service(s) areas ?
Is is highway=service like here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.808617lon=9.047404zoom=18layers=M
Or highway=motorway_link like here:
On 9/28/2011 3:04 PM, Pieren wrote:
What is our recommendation for tagging the access roads entering or
leaving motorway service(s) areas ?
No consensus. Keepright accepts either.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Toby Murray wrote:
The argument that more hard-core riders can't judge the
bicycle friendliness of a road is ridiculous. Any bicycle
friendliness tags will obviously be targeted at average
commuting cyclists.
It might seem obvious to you, but something else seems obvious to me!
And that's
Pieren wrote:
Then we can delete the keys smoothness , sac_scale, mtb:scale
and tracktype. But, oh no, they seem to be widely used.
YMMV. I've never seen the first three in the wild in the UK. tracktype was
once popular but is largely being supplanted by objective use of the
surface= tag.
We
On Thu, September 29, 2011 04:08, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 9/28/2011 3:04 PM, Pieren wrote:
What is our recommendation for tagging the access roads entering or
leaving motorway service(s) areas ?
No consensus. Keepright accepts either.
I generally use motorway_link because motorway
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:10:43 +0900
From: a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] rest_area and service road
On Thu, September 29, 2011 04:08, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 9/28/2011 3:04 PM, Pieren wrote:
What is our recommendation for tagging
17 matches
Mail list logo
