On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 08:04, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I've run into the same argument with people tagging construction sites for
various kinds of buildings. I always maintained that the object in question
is primarily a construction site, and the fact that a hotel or museum is
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 13:03, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Markus Lindholm
markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a proposal like that
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divider
that has been abandoned. Not sure of the reason.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a big step from current guidelines, and why shouldn't I map
lanes as separate ways then?
Why not. As soon as you tag them as 'lanes' and not 'highways' just
for routing convenience.
Pieren
Hi!
The proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/lanes_General_Extension
is now open for voting.
After the last similar proposal was rejected, I tried to find a
solution for the open issues, like support for reversibles,
center/median turn lanes, bicycle lanes, and so on.
Am 5. März 2012 12:54 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
I just found the idea of saying this is a railway - a never-built one, but
a railway nonetheless a little extravagant.
I think that the feature in question is not a never built one but a
never finished one, which makes some
Hi!
You summarized the problems with proposals very well: actually no-one
cares at all.
* If a proposal is opposed, doesn't matter - it is tagged that way anyway.
* If it is approved, doesn't matter also - it is still tagged somehow
differently
What I have seen in the last months regarding
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes_and_complex_intersections_visual_approach
User Cmuelle8 insists on adding it to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_tagging_comparison#A_visual_approach
as a valid alternate.
___
Tagging mailing list
Hi,
On 03/05/2012 08:12 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes_and_complex_intersections_visual_approach
User Cmuelle8 insists on adding it to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_tagging_comparison#A_visual_approach
as a valid alternate.
I think it is not
The proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lane_group is now
open for voting.
The proposal has been stable for the last couple of weeks and I find it
useful to have a vote on it now (noting that the competition has also
entered voting status).
Ole N / polderrunner
Martin Vonwald wrote:
Regarding your comments (which would better fit into the discussion page):
They were more of a footnote, but I'm happy to discuss them anyway. If
you prefer to have this discussion on the talk page, feel free to copy
the relevant sections of my mails to it. I don't mind
10 matches
Mail list logo
