Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Obstacle

2012/10/24 Pieren : > you take the risk that the tag is used for something else. Now, it > seems that this proposal will have to specify if it applies to > highways or waterways. There is already a specification, to whom it is an obstacle (obstacle:car, ...) maybe we could have an additional obst

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Obstacle

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Henning Scholland wrote: > > For more details take a look at FreieTonne or OpenSeaMap. > Here is the problem. You can create whatever tag you like. But document it on the OSM wiki, not on a third party project. Otherwise you take the risk that the tag is used for

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Obstacle

Am 24.10.2012 16:23, schrieb Eric SIBERT: About the values existing [...] For example, in my proposal there are a comment about obstacle=bridge (69,57% values of obstacle now), that can see here I'm surprise by the large use of obstacle=bridge. Do we have any idea on how it is used now? Éric

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Obstacle

2012/10/24 Tobias Knerr : > Isn't it a bit early for that? Most uses of the obstacle key are still > for values unrelated to your proposal: > > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org:8001/keys/obstacle#values I don't think that this is a real problem. Chances are high that "obstacle" is intended in the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Obstacle

On 24.10.2012 16:00, Konfrare Albert wrote: > Sorry, I'm following this page > , and > I thought that if there aren't suggestions or comments in two weeks, the > voting could be opened. You can open the voting, it's not against the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Obstacle

About the values existing [...] For example, in my proposal there are a comment about obstacle=bridge (69,57% values of obstacle now), that can see here I'm surprise by the large use of obstacle=bridge. Do we have any idea on how it is used now? Éric _

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Obstacle

Tobias, thanks for your warning, This is the first proposal that I make, and I'm trying to understand the process of "Feature proposal". This is why I'm cautious, and I'm asking questions and I'm alerting the community about what I do ;) Sorry, I'm following this page

Re: [Tagging] Enforcement of access rules

2012/10/24 Martin Koppenhoefer > 2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo : > > I agree, but a speed "camera" is not actually a camera. > > > -1, it is, and it is combined with a device to measure the speed of the > vehicle. > Ok, I see what you mean. Then I suggest something along the lines of enforcement_de

Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link

> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:26:11 -0400 > From: nice...@att.net > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link > > On 10/23/2012 4:10 PM, Johan C wrote: > > c) it quite often will be impossible for any (present/future) routing > > engine to always predict the ri

Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link

> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:49:57 +0900 > From: erringt...@gmail.com > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link > > > Richard didn't say he uses that key *because* it's not rendered; he > > uses it because it makes sense. The fact that it's not rendered on

Re: [Tagging] Enforcement of access rules

2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo : >> I think it would be better to have just "camera" and get the what is >> enforced from the "enforcement"-tag. A camera is a camera. > > > I agree, but a speed "camera" is not actually a camera. I hoped it would be > possible to differentiate between an actual video cam

Re: [Tagging] Enforcement of access rules

2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo : > I agree, but a speed "camera" is not actually a camera. -1, it is, and it is combined with a device to measure the speed of the vehicle. > I hoped it would be > possible to differentiate between an actual video camera (whose capture is > processed to detect plate n

Re: [Tagging] Enforcement of access rules

2012/10/24 Martin Koppenhoefer > 2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo : > > I wish to map the cameras that my municipality is installing these days > to > > enforce the access restriction in the ZTL ( = limited traffic area). I > think > > the most appropriate structure to do this would be the enforcement >

Re: [Tagging] Enforcement of access rules

2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo : > I wish to map the cameras that my municipality is installing these days to > enforce the access restriction in the ZTL ( = limited traffic area). I think > the most appropriate structure to do this would be the enforcement relation > [1], but none of the listed types o

[Tagging] Enforcement of access rules

I wish to map the cameras that my municipality is installing these days to enforce the access restriction in the ZTL ( = limited traffic area). I think the most appropriate structure to do this would be the enforcement relation [1], but none of the listed types of enforcement is up to the task. I