On 29/04/2013 18:59, News wrote:
I have created a proposal for a new tagging scheme at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/through_route
From the wiki Example:
If you are heading north on the A56 and want to continue on the A56
then you need to turn off the main carriageway
Am 01.05.2013 12:53, schrieb Philip Barnes:
The slip roads are straight ahead, whilst the through route curves to
the right. The tag is need to tell the router that straight ahead is
not stay on the same road.
Hope that explains it.
uhm, had you ever considered to tag both following ways
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 18:20 +0200, Georg Feddern wrote:
Am 01.05.2013 12:53, schrieb Philip Barnes:
The slip roads are straight ahead, whilst the through route curves
to the right. The tag is need to tell the router that straight ahead
is not stay on the same road.
Hope that explains
this example, http://osrm.at/36D
To stay on the A511 no instruction to turn is given,
That just looks like a bug in the osrm.
--
Alv
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
We already have that question on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/tree_shrine:
My answer was: I would say for the same reason why
historic=wayside_cross is not a combination of historic=wayside_shrine
and landmark=cross (or man_made=cross) since they can look very
In the UK many of these would come under the heading of blue plaques. If you
follow wikipedia through on this topic it talks about historical marker in
the first sentence so people wishing to map these features may well search for
this on the OSM wiki. historic=marker would there for seem to
I would use tourism=information, information=board, board_type=historic (or
sth else more specific) for the examples on the wikipage:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/historic_marker
cheers,
Martin
2013/5/1 Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com
In the UK many of these
