Re: [Tagging] Underground power lines in tunnel

2013-06-04 Thread François Lacombe
Thanks fly for this answer. Type=tunnel can suits my needs : let's add all power lines in the relation with role=through. Add tubes or not depends on the tunnel design, not on what's inside. I don't mind. The trick is to link many power lines to a single tunnel. However, it would be hard to

Re: [Tagging] Underground power lines in tunnel

2013-06-04 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi That's already a problem for ways, too: A motorway with two separate highways in OSM may be one bridge alltogether - but is mapped as two. A street where the footways along are separated by a small wall or a hedge is drawn as distinct osm ways (at least it should be) but if these ways share the

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Erik Johansson
BTW is there a tag for cannon that still go BANG now and then; historic=cannon+bang=yes? I guess fixed artillery hasn't much room in the defense of today, so it's still a historic thing. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 6/3/13 3:49 PM, René

Re: [Tagging] Underground power lines in tunnel

2013-06-04 Thread fly
Am 04.06.2013 11:15, schrieb François Lacombe: 2013/6/4 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com: On 04.06.2013 00:26, François Lacombe wrote: Hi, I'm currently improving draft of power transmission refinement proposal and a question about underground features can't currently find answer.

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
On 04/giu/2013, at 10:12, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote: BTW is there a tag for cannon that still go BANG now and then; historic=cannon+bang=yes? I guess fixed artillery hasn't much room in the defense of today, so it's still a historic thing. +1, e.g. there is a cannon in Rome

Re: [Tagging] pastry and confectionery

2013-06-04 Thread Murry McEntire
I've been doing some research, perhaps towards producing a formal proposal page, of how bakery and confectionery should be handled for the United States (and perhaps some of the other English speaking countries - I hope those from Britain, Canada, Australia, etc. would identify their country and

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Janko Mihelić
Disused=yes for non functional cannons and disused=no for functional ones sounds good to me. Janko ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Underground power lines in tunnel

2013-06-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
On 04/giu/2013, at 08:54, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: A motorway with two separate highways in OSM may be one bridge alltogether - but is mapped as two. actually we usually don't map bridges or tunnels, there is only the indirect mapping with an attribute on the road

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
On 04/giu/2013, at 23:05, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: Disused=yes for non functional cannons and disused=no for functional ones sounds good to me. -1, this approach is generally discouraged: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disused cheers,

Re: [Tagging] tagging cannons

2013-06-04 Thread Richard Welty
On 6/4/13 6:49 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: On 04/giu/2013, at 23:05, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: Disused=yes for non functional cannons and disused=no for functional ones sounds good to me. -1, this approach is generally discouraged: