Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=pasture

2013-07-06 Thread Dudley Ibbett
With regard to your comment below I am aware of mappers that use meadow because there are horses in a field year round. Personally, I don't think this is the way to identify a meadow. We currently have the farmland/farm landuse tag. It would seem that this should be the primary tag and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bakery,confectionery

2013-07-06 Thread fly
Am 05.07.2013 19:18, schrieb Murry McEntire: Hey Murry The proposal talk page has been rather inactive, a bit more discussion happening on the mailing list. I would like comment on the Additional tags section of the talk page where tags such as site_produced=yes/all/most/some/few/no,

Re: [Tagging] landuse=construction vs. building=construction

2013-07-06 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi. I personally would use building=construction only for the building that get's constructed currently, as it's the building key. Even a small area around that belongs to the construction site is landuse=construction, but building=construction (as it's no building). But if I knew the buildings

Re: [Tagging] landuse=construction vs. building=construction

2013-07-06 Thread fly
Am 06.07.2013 15:10, schrieb Peter Wendorff: Am 06.07.2013 03:26, schrieb L. David Baron: This leads me to the questions: * Should these ways be tagged as building=construction or landuse=construction? landuse. * If they should be tagged as building=construction, should the