Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting Open - toilets, toilets:disposal, pitlatrine

2013-07-18 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/7/15 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com Open for voting is http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets what does fully private and public mean? Can I map a toilet on a camp

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting Open - toilets, toilets:disposal, pitlatrine

2013-07-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 18/lug/2013 um 08:06 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com: access=public (explicitly public and open to whoever walks up. A fee may apply.) access=permissive (while nominally private, no visible attempt is made to restrict access, and casual use appears to be tolerated by the

[Tagging] Double and misfitting house numbers

2013-07-18 Thread Tobias
There are two things concerning house numbers, I do not know how to tag correctly: --- 1. Double house numbers: I want to tag the house number 101 of a shop. The building in which the romms of the shop are located has the house

Re: [Tagging] Double and misfitting house numbers

2013-07-18 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Tobias cra_klinr...@gmx.de wrote: 1. Double house numbers: I want to tag the house number 101 of a shop. The building in which the romms of the shop are located has the house numbers 97,99,101,103,105,107,109. The house numbers of the building are either

Re: [Tagging] Double and misfitting house numbers

2013-07-18 Thread Tobias
On 18.07.2013 16:53, Serge Wroclawski wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Tobias cra_klinr...@gmx.de wrote: 1. Double house numbers: I want to tag the house number 101 of a shop. The building in which the romms of the shop are located has the house numbers 97,99,101,103,105,107,109. The

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting Open - toilets, toilets:disposal, pitlatrine

2013-07-18 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: access=permissive (while nominally private, no visible attempt is made to restrict access, and casual use appears to be tolerated by the owners). access=inquiry (an inquiry must be made for access, for example

Re: [Tagging] Double and misfitting house numbers

2013-07-18 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Tobias cra_klinr...@gmx.de wrote: It is kind of both. So in the end you will have the 101 on the building and the shop. That seems okay to me. We don't map to the renderer, so if it's both, it's both. If you feel strongly it should only be on one, let it be

Re: [Tagging] Double and misfitting house numbers

2013-07-18 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
For the two buildings sharing one address: is there a higher level tag on the lines of landuse= that could have the address:housenumber= attached? Example use case: a corporate campus with multiple buildings, but a single postal address. ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Childcare Tag

2013-07-18 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM, alyssa wright alyssapwri...@gmail.com wrote: It is my understanding that kindergarten means something very different in other places of the world. How does OSM account for such cultural

Re: [Tagging] Childcare Tag

2013-07-18 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: Of the solutions, I feel that calling it what it's called locally is preferable. Anyone who cares to compare across countries is going to have to parse the location first anyway. We've managed to handle creating

Re: [Tagging] Open of discussion on operational_status (part of life cycle with disused/abandoned/demolished)

2013-07-18 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
Looking at the existing tagging, I think I will take a ride down the slippery slope you mention. For example: an aed is an emergency medical device people are mapping. Learning the locations of these could be important in an emergency: checking the mapping makes sense. So how about: