Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread Gerhard Hermanns
Hi, I don't agree with the use of the "landuse"-key. Landuse should be used for larger areas where you need a (generic) term for a conglomerate of objects (like "landuse=residential" for an area with houses, garages, gardens, streets - each of which can also be mapped seperately), but not for

[Tagging] new tagging scheme for detailed information.

2013-07-22 Thread amrit karmacharya
Over the last several months, we have mapped all the schools and health facility buildings here in Kathmandu, Nepal visiting the ground with GPS-enabled devices. This data will primarily be used in earthquake vulnerability assessment We are now trying to upload these information in OSM. When we ch

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread John F. Eldredge
I am saying that the land_use tag makes sense for in-ground pools, since they greatly reduce the odds of the land subsequently being used for some other purpose. Yes, I know such reuse does happen on rare occasions; the city of Nashville, TN, closed all of its public pools in the 1960's rather

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:04 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: > You state "The pool after all is a man-made object that just sits on the > ground". Some pools sit on the surface of the ground, and so could > potentially be moved from one location to another. Others are built into an > excavation, and c

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread John F. Eldredge
You state "The pool after all is a man-made object that just sits on the ground". Some pools sit on the surface of the ground, and so could potentially be moved from one location to another. Others are built into an excavation, and can't be moved without demolishing them. They are a permanent

Re: [Tagging] one way part of the year

2013-07-22 Thread Tod Fitch
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ski#Other_Features gives a piste:one way tag which seems like it should fit the bill. Tod -- Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity. doug brown wrote: >I'm looking for ideas on how to tag state park trails that are two way >hiking trails in the

[Tagging] one way part of the year

2013-07-22 Thread doug brown
I'm looking for ideas on how to tag state park trails that are two way hiking trails in the summer, but one way cross country ski trails in the winter. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://l

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
Ok. Based on this I tried to clarify at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool The stuff needed by a mapper is up now top, the controversy stuff is now lower down. --- I found a variety of interesting uses of tagging, including landuse=reservior, which wa

Re: [Tagging] Are addresses features or attributes?

2013-07-22 Thread Tobias
> This argument recalls the discussions about the "is_in" tag... The POI > within a building polygon containing the address is just the next > refinement after the street way within the municipality polygon. All > common GIS software are able to do it. I agree. But it is really unsatisfactory that

Re: [Tagging] Are addresses features or attributes?

2013-07-22 Thread Pieren
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:26 PM, fly wrote: > The major problem I have: > The common tools do not take an address from a surrounding/parent > polygon and use to it to get display the address. Even nominatum does > not handle that right. This argument recalls the discussions about the "is_in" tag

Re: [Tagging] Are addresses features or attributes?

2013-07-22 Thread fly
Am 22.07.2013 06:53, schrieb Bryce Nesbitt: > > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Clifford Snow > wrote: > > I'm in favor of keeping addresses on vacant lots. Vacant lots often > get rebuilt > > It would be nice if we had an option to retain th

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread fly
Am 22.07.2013 11:58, schrieb Simone Saviolo: > 2013/7/22 Bryce Nesbitt mailto:bry...@obviously.com>> > > After > reading http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool I > can't figure out. > Is this tag for the actual wet area of a pool, or the fenced area of >

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
On 22/lug/2013, at 11:30, SomeoneElse wrote: > I'd ignore the wiki and look at what people have actually mapped using > something like Overpass or an XAPI service. -1, it is not practical to look at 290.000 occurences with overpass or xapi, so this won't give you anything representative. IM

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread Simone Saviolo
2013/7/22 Bryce Nesbitt > After reading > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool I can't > figure out. > Is this tag for the actual wet area of a pool, or the fenced area of a > pool facility? The page spends > a lot of words about past controversy, but seems silent on th

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread Janko Mihelić
leisure=swimming_pool renders blue on mapnik, so it was probably mostly used for the actual pools. Janko 2013/7/22 SomeoneElse > Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > >> After reading http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/** >> wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_**pool

Re: [Tagging] leisure=swimming_pool for the pool or the complex?

2013-07-22 Thread SomeoneElse
Bryce Nesbitt wrote: After reading http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool I can't figure out. Is this tag for the actual wet area of a pool, or the fenced area of a pool facility? The page spends a lot of words about past controversy, but seems silent on this topic. l

Re: [Tagging] Are addresses features or attributes?

2013-07-22 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 22.07.2013 04:21, Clifford Snow wrote: On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Friedrich Volkmann mailto:b...@volki.at>> wrote: When a shop changes, it is true that the address is more permanent. Just like the coordinates are more permanent. But we won't necessarily keep them in OSM if