Wow, I never heard of qanats.
man_made=qanat and qanat=shaft sound ok, although I would rather use
waterway=qanat. I see there are only 3 man_made=qanats mapped right now,
so there is no problems with changing those.
Janko
2013/9/27 Michał Sałaban mic...@salaban.info
Hi,
I've just created
I'm not sure whether this should have its own tag; how different is it
from either an underground pipeline or an underground canal?
__John
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, wouldn't we be able to use waterway=canal, tunnel=yes (or whatever tag
we use for underground waterways)? Possibly combined with qanat=yes?
Or perhaps waterway=canal, tunnel=yes, canal=qanat?
This makes sense. It
On 2013-09-17 21:49, Rob Nickerson wrote :
Daniel wrote:
- Make it easier to edit the wiki.
Hi Daniel,
I agree - the wiki can be hard to edit if you have never done this
before. This is why I requested a visual editor (that is now used by
Wikipedia) to be added. Unfortunately this
man_made=pipeline, pipeline=qanat? This is similar to how the aqueduct
page proposes to tag modern aqueducts, but qanats seem a distinct type of
structure from aqueducts due to the vertical wells. (And I agree with
John's point that it is not really like a pipeline, but I'd argue that OSM
often
Am 27/set/2013 um 12:18 schrieb Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
Also, wouldn't we be able to use waterway=canal, tunnel=yes (or whatever tag
we use for underground waterways)? Possibly combined with qanat=yes?
I'd rather use something like canal_type=qanat instead of sth
Ok thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Post-vote-clean-up-tp5779068p5779182.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
fly high wrote
but they are called falls (natural=waterfalls ?).
+1 falls is better
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/waterfall-tp5778845p5779185.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Can we modify the proposal natural=waterfall because the writer stop the
work?
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/waterfall-tp5778845p5779186.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Tagging
On Sep 27, 2013 3:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 27/set/2013 um 12:18 schrieb Matthijs Melissen
i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
Also, wouldn't we be able to use waterway=canal, tunnel=yes (or
whatever tag we use for underground waterways)? Possibly combined with
On 27.09.2013 16:20, bredy wrote:
Can we modify the proposal natural=waterfall because the writer stop the
work?
If we get to a conclusion that natural=waterfalls is the whole area with
maybe several falls + rapids it would be better to start a new one and
describe the differences.
Right now
On the canal wiki article http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canal it
says An artificial open waterway used for transportation, waterpower, or
irrigation. I guess we have to add drinking water to that list.
When you look at the Wikipedia canal
articlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canal,
there is
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
When you look at the Wikipedia canal article, there is nothing remotely
similar to a qanat.
It is not, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqueduct_(water_supply)
looks more similar and even lists qanat as a form of aqueduct.
Am 27.09.2013 um 21:33 schrieb Michał Sałaban mic...@salaban.info:
However it might create confusion with already existing bridge=aqueduct.
IMHO bridge=aqueduct is nonsense, we also don't use bridge=highway or railway,
and aqueducts don't have to be bridges, they are also underground, or on
OK, I gathered the three ideas here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Qanat#Tagging
Any thoughts on it? Preferences?
I realized it is not easy to make a distinction between canal and
aqueduct, but we may assume that the latter is usually for drinking
water or irrigation of
Dear all,
There are currently various tags for gambling-related shops and amenities
in use, including amenity=casino, shop=bookmaker, shop=betting,
shop=lottery, and shop=gambling. See here for an overview of usage
statistics:
16 matches
Mail list logo