On 9 December 2013 11:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> It sounds strange to me that the DWG would "approve an edit" beforehand.
> Usually it is the community to approve such actions (if they are possible at
> all). Where did you get the idea from that DWG should or would "approve" a
> mechanical e
2013/12/9 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> 2013/12/9 Matthijs Melissen
>>
>> Just to keep you up-to-date: the data working group has not responded
>> yet to my request for approval of this mechanical edit. They have not
>> indicated a time span they need to decide, or even acknowledged
>> receipt, so at
2013/12/9 Matthijs Melissen
> Just to keep you up-to-date: the data working group has not responded
> yet to my request for approval of this mechanical edit. They have not
> indicated a time span they need to decide, or even acknowledged
> receipt, so at this moment, I cannot give any further inf
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 00:55 -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, December 8, 2013, Jonathan wrote:
> It's the sort of building that houses the security guards or
> gatekeeper. They operate the gates to allow entrance to or
> exit from the site. May contain security guar
