On 12/12/2013 05:53 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/12/12 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
IMHO it would be nice to have an alternative dataset in lower zoomlevels
for geographic regions and extended/blurry features, something like a set
of shapefiles with translations into all languages
With mountain ranges there would be a major problem where node should be
placed. Carpathian Mountains cover 190 000 km² - good luck with edit wars where
node should be placed.
It probably would work better as a separate database.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 03:09:47 -0800 Andrew Guertin
2013/12/12 Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu
Many villages or other small human settlements have no clearly defined
boundaries, and we just represent them as a node.
IMHO big human settlements are more difficult than small ones when it comes
to define their edges. You can represent (from
On 2013-12-12 at 12:37:30 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/12/12 Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu
Many villages or other small human settlements have no clearly defined
boundaries, and we just represent them as a node.
IMHO big human settlements are more difficult than small ones
2013/12/12 Elena ``of Valhalla'' elena.valha...@gmail.com
big human settlements tend to be associated with one or more clearly
define legal entities and we tend to map those, not the actual
settlement.
actually we are mapping both, and there is no compelling reason to refrain
from mapping
it won't be a clearly defined border where some meters more or less matter or
are clearly definable
IMO one can always ask the locals/local geologists is this location/point a
part of the mountain/mountain range. At some point, everybody agrees that it
is, and somewhere further down the
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:24 PM, bulwersator bulwersa...@zoho.com wrote:
With mountain ranges there would be a major problem where node should be
placed. Carpathian Mountains cover 190 000 km² - good luck with edit wars
where node should be placed.
It'd be a way, not a node. And maybe there
On 11.12.2013 11:58, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Malcolm Herring
malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com wrote:
Anyway, this thread is about the import, not the tagging! I know that we all
love to argue about tags, but this is best done in the tagging list.
Yes, what is the
On 06.12.2013 14:25, Dan S wrote:
2013/12/6 Axelos gnu...@laposte.net:
Hello
Le 05/12/2013 12:16, SomeoneElse a écrit :
Axelos wrote:
I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used
military equipment.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus
If you
Le 11/12/2013 11:15, Malcolm Herring a écrit :
It is not rather than, but as well as. The harbour object is
tagged with a list of *available* facilities, the tag values being
free text to qualify those availabilities. e.g. harbour:toilets
could take the value private, access by code.
I
On 06.12.2013 02:24, Satoshi IIDA wrote:
Hi list,
I have created a proposal page to describe Baby care schema.
It's now on RFC stage with this mail.
Please feel free to add your comments on the page.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/babycare
Your proposal is not
11 matches
Mail list logo
