Hi,
On 27.12.2013 02:46, Fernando Trebien wrote:
In principle, if Antarctic territories' status is said to be only
claimed (as described by the Antarctic Treaty), they can't be
considered de facto, therefore they shouldn't currently be specified
as members of the boundary relations of Norway,
Hm I don't believe these people are reading our discussion. I'll try to
track down their usernames among the dozens of changesets and contact them.
Perhaps it would also be a good idea to involve the whole community of
these countries (by posting a short call to talk-ar, talk-no and talk-au),
both
I don't want to unnecessarily add to this already lengthy thread but the
most visible error in the Antarctica boundaries in my opinion is that
they go to 60°S latitude. This is wrong both in terms of the Antarctic
Treaty (which specifically excludes the 'high seas') and in terms of
I guess they can be edited then. All I did so far was convert them into
multipolygons and merge any overlapping lines. (I can only do this edit 2
days from now, so if you wish you can go ahead).
In fact, the original polygons extended all the way to 89.999 S,
causing bugs in JOSM. I brought
