On 01/04/2014 02:01, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Fly mentioned shelter_type just now — another type of wilderness
accommodation is a basic shelter called a lean-to, a rough three
sided, roofed shelter, open to the elements on one side.
That's an odd use of the word 'lean-to'. Yes, a lean-to is a
In the old days when the term was first brought into use in the Adirondack
Mountains, it was just that, a bunch of spruce branches leaning against a
tree. At any rate, they are common features in the eastern American
wilderness regions.
See this link about lean-tos on the Appalachian Trail
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 08:01:01AM +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote:
I think a link to shelter:type would be a good addition to the Map
Features; Tourism page for further choices when tagging wilderness
shelters. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type. Note that
this page throws more
Hello everyone,
This is my first post to the list, which I've just joined, but I've
been a mapper for a few years and some of you might remember me as
compere at last year's State of the Map.
Yesterday, I met with the W3Cs' data on the web best practice
working group. At their request, I gave a
Could the more general description found for mountain hut
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_hut be used in the context of
alpine_hut as this would make it more universal. This would then cover the
climbing huts found in the UK as described in the wikipedia article.
Additional tags
Hi Andy,
2014-04-01 16:29 GMT+01:00 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
Hello everyone,
This is my first post to the list, which I've just joined, but I've
been a mapper for a few years and some of you might remember me as
compere at last year's State of the Map.
And well done indeed!
On 1 April 2014 17:31, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-01 16:29 GMT+01:00 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
last year's State of the Map.
And well done indeed!
Thank you.
I've just modified [[Template:KeyDescription]] by adding
two parameters:
for website and
I commend this proposal to the list:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hi all,
I'm new on this mailing list, but I spend a few months already on the
talk-fr list and I've been mapping for a while longer.
I just wanted to mention a new tag I created yesterday:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcloud
I was quite surprised that there wasn't already a
On 1 April 2014 18:08, Pierre Knobel pierr...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to mention a new tag I created yesterday:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcloud
I think this is tag a very good idea. Clouds are very noticeable
features in the landscape. I just have some concerns
I am hoping this has something to do with it being April 1st
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
wrote:
On 1 April 2014 18:08, Pierre Knobel pierr...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to mention a new tag I created yesterday:
On Tuesday 01 April 2014, Pierre Knobel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new on this mailing list, but I spend a few months already on the
talk-fr list and I've been mapping for a while longer.
I just wanted to mention a new tag I created yesterday:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcloud
2014-04-01 19:14 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
On 1 April 2014 18:08, Pierre Knobel pierr...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to mention a new tag I created yesterday:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcloud
I think this is tag a very good idea. Clouds
I see the problem, it's tricky. Maybe we've hit the boundaries of what it
is possible to achieve with nodes, ways and relations. Maybe we should ask
the developers to add a new type of object that would be more suitable for
this situation. It would need to be diffuse, span over several layers and
Sounds about right, but add layer=* tags where appropriate. Clouds go above
the land, so we have to make sure they render above everything (except
certain bridges and buildings). Might as well add layer=5 to all of them
for good measure.
On Apr 1, 2014 12:16 PM, Matthijs Melissen
Pierre Knobel wrote on Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:08:01 +0200:
I'm new on this mailing list, but I spend a few months already on the
talk-fr list and I've been mapping for a while longer.
I just wanted to mention a new tag I created yesterday:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcloud
I
Rendering for natural=cloud has been added to the FR rendering:
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=15lat=48.63541lon=-1.51142layers=B000FFT
white = non rainy cloud
dark = rainy cloud
2014-04-01 19:25 GMT+02:00 Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.com:
Sounds about right, but add layer=*
On 4/1/14 1:01 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I'd be happy to do that; what do others think? While semantically
correct, I think more mapper might understand URL.
is it a URI or a URL? if it's strictly a URL, that's fine, URL as a term is
not deprecated, it's merely a subset of URI. but if you intend
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.ukwrote:
The model used there fails with Wikipedia links,
expressed as en:Example, because the equivalent URL is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example. Any suggestions for dealing
with that?
[...] ambiguous keys (ref=1234
On 01.04.2014 19:04, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I commend this proposal to the list:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
I like Wikidata and therefore want to see this proposal approved. :)
What I'm interested in, though: If an object exists both in Wikipedia
and
If an object exists both in Wikipedia
and Wikidata, would you expect both tags to be used? Wikipedia links can
be obtained from the Wikidata API for a given Wikidata ID and vice
versa, so one of the two would suffice.
It might seem redundant but the key wikipedia shouldn't be removed when
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 12:25:03PM -0500, Clay Smalley wrote:
Sounds about right, but add layer=* tags where appropriate. Clouds go above
the land, so we have to make sure they render above everything (except
certain bridges and buildings). Might as well add layer=5 to all of them
for good
On 2014-04-01 17:29, Andy Mabbett wrote
:
Hello everyone,
This is my first post to the list, which I've just joined, but I've
been a mapper for a few years and some of you might remember me as
compere at last year's State of the Map.
Yesterday, I met with the
On 2014-04-01 23:17, Tobias Knerr wrote :
On 01.04.2014 19:04, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I commend this proposal to the list:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
I like Wikidata and therefore want to see this proposal approved. :)
What I'm interested in, though: If an
24 matches
Mail list logo
