Thanks for the help and the links. That was my opinion, too.
I asked, because the use is not clear by just reading the definition and not
looking at the examples.
highway=road + cycleway=track + bicycle=use_sidepath together, without an
additional highway=cycleway OSMWay (for example) seem
If I understand correctly you say it would be better if the wiki stated
that the compulsory cycleway is drawn as a separte way. I think you are
right. I could changed that in the wiki. Unfortunately the user Ulamm has
changed the wiki (for the worse in my opinion) so I'll send him an email
before
Thanks a lot, and yes You understood me correctly.
Regards
Hubert
From: Pee Wee [mailto:piewi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014 12:48
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Vandalis on access page
If I understand correctly you say it would
Hi,
May be you could link to cycleway:mandatory, too. Which would give a
reference to the analog usage if there is cycleway=* used on the road.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
But I do not know whether there is a proposition page for
cycleway:mandatory. So maybe this tag should
It is perfectly fine to revert somebody. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle
2014-10-08 12:48 GMT+02:00 Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com:
If I understand correctly you say it would be better if the wiki stated
that the compulsory cycleway is drawn as a separte way.
I''ll wait till the edit war is over before I make any changes.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepathaction=history
Apparently it is very difficult to discuss prior to making changes.
Cheers
PeeWee32
2014-10-08 14:18 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny
