On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:13 PM, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it's nonsensical but...
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=entrance%3Dexit
It's like Microsoft story where you have to click on 'start' to stop windows...
But it is not because someone didn't make the best choice
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
To tag or not to tag, that is the vote! ;-)
Help me understand how we get to a document tagging standard on the wiki
without voting. Is there a
I like this proposal.
I would add the requirement that the highways/railways/paths that go over a
bridge have to share a node with the outline area.
Lukas Sommer
2014-10-10 14:44 GMT+00:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
man_made=bridge as proposed on
I like this proposal too, would it be possible to extend it to tunnels or would
that require a similar proposal?
Phil (trigpoint )
On Mon Oct 13 2014 11:12:00 GMT+0100 (BST), Lukas Sommer wrote:
I like this proposal.
I would add the requirement that the highways/railways/paths that go over
Hi!
2014-10-13 12:12 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
I would add the requirement that the highways/railways/paths that go over
a bridge have to share a node with the outline area.
Second sentence in the section Tagging - Bridges with one level: Connect
all OSM ways running over
Second sentence in the section Tagging - Bridges with one level:
Connect all OSM ways running over that bridge to the outline.
Sorry, I missed this.
Perfect!
Lukas
Lukas Sommer
2014-10-13 10:34 GMT+00:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
Hi!
2014-10-13 12:12 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer
Rather a similar proposal, tunnels are more troublesome (see also talk
page).
2014-10-13 12:28 GMT+02:00 p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
I like this proposal too, would it be possible to extend it to tunnels or
would that require a similar proposal?
Phil (trigpoint )
On Mon Oct 13 2014 11:12:00
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 17:00 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Rather a similar proposal, tunnels are more troublesome (see also talk
page).
There does seem to be a lot about multiple tubes there, I would expect
those to be mapped separately, but would like to see a single tunnel
only where
I started a vote on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dbridge
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Paweł Marynowski y...@openstreetmap.pl wrote:
The idea was to reflect, the best we can, situation with graves.
This is not clear in the proposal. It's much more than graves.
Birthday, family, description, etc. If you check examples, it is
reused to add every
2014-10-13 19:43 GMT+02:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Paweł Marynowski y...@openstreetmap.pl
wrote:
The idea was to reflect, the best we can, situation with graves.
This is not clear in the proposal. It's much more than graves.
Birthday, family,
I think OSM isn't a place for this. Number of the grave should be enough,
and naming people in the grave (if they are not famous) looks like data for
other databases. What are other uses for this relation type? Home of a
person, workplace of a person, current location of a person?
2014-10-13
W dniu 13.10.2014 23:04, Janko Mihelić pisze:
Number of the grave should be enough, and naming people in the grave
Number of grave? What do you mean? Number of grave is not visible on the
grave.
What if there are several people in the grave (with different names)?
Semicolons?
13 matches
Mail list logo
