2014-12-12 17:28 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Am 05.12.2014 um 21:30 schrieb Paul Johnson:
How about site relations? Seems like a good use of a site relation.
As long as it possible to draw the whole site as a single polygon, there
is no need of a site relation.
+1
unless
2014-12-15 8:00 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
PS:Basic categories of restaurants in Japan
- Ramen, soba, udon
- cutlet
- Steak
- Italian
- Indian
- “Family” restaurant (denny’s, etc)
- Sushi / traditional Japanese
- Chinese
- takoyaki (octopus balls)
- karaage (Japanese style fried
Hi
We have
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amenity_features#kids_area.3Dno.2Findoor.2Foutdoor.2Fboth
for kids areas mappings.
But sometimes kids area is an independant amenity. I think it would be nice to
have amenity to map such features.
So here is mine proposal for that
Hi,
The obvious question is: why not using leisure=playground? Since the
definition in the first link you give says an area where kids can
play.
Dan
2014-12-15 10:51 GMT+00:00 Dmitry Kiselev dkise...@osm.me:
Hi
We have
One of the driving schools I went to is a permanent course laid out on a flood
plain ( as is the soccer fields and helipads), but as it is inside a leveed
flood canal, they are not allowed to build permanent buildings.
So the driving school uses a bus. It has a desk, a waiting room, and
Playgrounds are usually outdoor facilities, kids playing rooms and areas are
usually not.
Playgrounds almost newer are supervised by any kind of stuff.
Kids areas and rooms, in most cases have employees who takes care of kids.
Also there is different kind of activities for playgrounds and such
I don't see a need for a new key here.
The properties can be easily modelled with sub-tagging of playground:
leisure=playground
playground:supervised=yes/no
playground:outdoor=yes/no
playground:indoor=yes/no
(btw, using kids_area=both in the older proposal is poor tagging since
it is not
2014-12-15 13:31 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org:
I don't see a need for a new key here.
The properties can be easily modelled with sub-tagging of playground:
Fully agree.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 15/12/2014 12:31, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
I don't see a need for a new key here.
The properties can be easily modelled with sub-tagging of playground:
+1
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
I can't agree with you guys.
All kinds of facilities where you can rent a bed for a night may be mapped as
hotel with tons of sub-tags.
But still we have hotels, motels, guest houses, and so on.
Even campings offers you some place to sleep and other stuff for money.
All kinds of places where
Hi propose
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ufficio_pubblico
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amenity_features#kids_area.3Dno.2Findoor.2Foutdoor.2Fboth
becaus I want create a specific tag for public institutions in Italy such
as informagiovani because this concept does
2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not
need a custom tag for it
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_building
Why is this abandoned? I just read the talk page, but it is not really
2014-12-15 15:52 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not
need a custom tag for it
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_building
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informagiovani does not look to me
Italy-specific
:-)
On 15 December 2014 at 15:31, Simone Savio simone.savio...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi propose
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ufficio_pubblico
2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not
need a custom tag for it
from my experience it is mostly not the amount of bureaucracy but the
response times that are a real show stopper ;-)
Dmitry Kiselev wrote on 2014-12-15 14:52:
I can't agree with you guys.
All kinds of facilities where you can rent a bed for a night may be mapped as
hotel with tons of sub-tags.
But still we have hotels, motels, guest houses, and so on.
[...]
We have restaurants and cafe, both offers you
2014-12-15 17:03 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not
need a custom tag for it
from my experience it is mostly not the amount of
2014-12-12 1:59 GMT+01:00 715371 osmu715...@gmx.de:
I am wondering if the building-tag should be used for moveable objects.
I guess that this is not in the sense of the meaning of building (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building#Residential and check for
houseboats).
I believe that we
Coming back to city walls. Our walls in Padova are massive, were built
mid 1500 and are still there. They are at present not tagged
historic and hence don't show up on the history map.
Thanks Volker for pointing us at that. The citywalls are tagged
correctly. However there was a bug in our
On 12/15/2014 08:31 AM, Simone Savio wrote:
Hi propose
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ufficio_pubblico
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amenity_features#kids_area.3Dno.2Findoor.2Foutdoor.2Fboth
becaus I want create a specific tag for public institutions in Italy
such
working on a proposal for civic landuses, and a subtag for building=civic for
all kinds of governmental buildings and services.
Your input is appreciated.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic
javbw
On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:30 AM, John F. Eldredge
The best way is probably locals developping a tagging scheme for their
field. The only problem then would be cuisine types that don't exist in the
country of which they pretend to come from ;-)
Yep - I’m sure the traditional, sushi, soba, udon, and maybe even the
imported-from-china ramen
22 matches
Mail list logo
