As poodles are always the litmus test for new tags, toy poodles are
acceptable, full poodles are not. You can stash your sacrifice in your
carry-on quite quickly if need be - if it's a toy poodle.
Javbw
On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:23 AM, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 10/01/2015
multi fits the sports tagging scheme well, and I think it is best for the
religion tag too.
Allis not good, as most sports places don have a clay sumo ring or a sandy
pit for beach volleyball set up, so all would be wrong.
Similarly, animal sacrifice and practicing voodoo at the airport's
On 10/01/2015 00:17, John Willis wrote:
Similarly, animal sacrifice and practicing voodoo at the airport's prayer room
might get you arrested.
Not even poodles? :)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-January/020847.html
Cheers,
Andy
On 01/01/2015 00:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 01/01/15 00:36, Dave F. wrote:
I'm struggling to comprehend how a button to turn off the notes layer,
that's separate ( hidden!) from the only obvious button to turn the
layer on can be described as 'logical' to an experienced user let alone
a newbie..
This appears to be nothing to do with tagging - you've presumably
sent to this list by mistake...
2015-01-09 12:12 GMT+00:00 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
On 01/01/2015 00:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 01/01/15 00:36, Dave F. wrote:
I'm struggling to comprehend how a button to turn off the
Apologies Thanks.
On 09/01/2015 12:17, Dan S wrote:
This appears to be nothing to do with tagging - you've presumably
sent to this list by mistake...
2015-01-09 12:12 GMT+00:00 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
On 01/01/2015 00:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 01/01/15 00:36, Dave F. wrote:
I'm
Wouldn't it be simplest to leave the religion or denomination tag
out, if the facility isn't specific to a particular religion or
denomination?
__John
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 09/01/2015 01:53, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on
On 2015-01-09 12:25, Dave F. wrote:
I'll leave them for now, as I can work around them, but I'm still not
convinced of their use or comments given by others as reasons to keep them.
Out of respect to the mappers who have gone before you, isn't a valid
excuse to keep data if it's
On 08/01/2015 09:35, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 08/01/2015 01:21, Dave F. wrote:
Are they relevant? If so, what are they for? The wiki suggests
they're superseded:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members
No it doesn't, it says they're 'optional, disputed, and
On 09/01/2015 01:53, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-01-09 00:56:
denomination=none
;-)
Nice, but we need to stay on the religion= level
But couldn't the sharing be inter-denominational, rather than
inter-religion?
As I see it:
1. No specific religion, such as rooms
10 matches
Mail list logo
