SomeoneElse wrote on 2015-02-15 10:52:
You can't always take taginfo numbers at face value.
right. let's look closer.
For example, in the UK much of the usage of landuse=religious was introduced
by this changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25035328
14 I have counted in this
On 15/02/2015 11:17, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
I find that landuse=churchyard vs.
landuse=religious+religion=christian have
the same meaning, with the advantage that the latter works multicultural.
No.
If you read back up through this and previous threads, you'll see that
landuse=religious
Landuse=religious is a generic version of churchyard.
I can think of several large church complexes in California - a massive Mormon
temple, a Presbyterian church ground a with a small preschool, a couple
Catholic Churches, a Jehovah's Witness hall, a big mega-church hall, a
cult-like church
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Mihkel Rämmel r...@hot.ee wrote:
Does anyone have objections to adding a second picture of mobile mast
to man_made=mast on wiki and clarifying that masts can be higher than
'only a few meters'.
Does anyone have objections to adding a second picture of mobile mast
to man_made=mast on wiki and clarifying that masts can be higher than
'only a few meters'.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Mobile_communications_mast.JPG
Mihkel
___
Tagging
On 15/02/2015 01:24, Warin wrote:
What 'landuse' would you say it is? It does not fit in any of the
values given on the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse
There are over 2,900 tagged landuse=religious currently. as shown by
the taginfo.
You can't always take taginfo
Am 15.02.2015 um 21:25 schrieb Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us:
I've been taught that a mast is usually not self supporting, ie. has guy
wires while a tower is self supporting.
+1
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been taught that a mast is usually not self supporting, ie. has guy
wires while a tower is self supporting.
+1
Also, the wiki definition needs changing IMO. Maybe they meant to say, a
few meters in
On the one hand I'm not adding roles to the ways in PT routes relations
anymore, instead I add all the ways in the correct order. Some ways are
included twice.
But if you prefer to add them, you have to know forward/backward relates to
the direction of the way itself. If it follows the arrow:
