Hello, there.
I'm drafting a proposal concerning some waterways whose flow regularly changes
direction, which happens near some sinkholes named estavelles, which drain or
feed water according to the aquifer level. I would consequently propose a way
to map it, but it should be consistent with
On 07/09/2015, David Marchal wrote:
> I'm drafting a proposal concerning some waterways whose flow regularly
> changes direction, which happens near some sinkholes named estavelles, which
> drain or feed water according to the aquifer level. I would consequently
> propose a way
It seems that oneway:flow=yes|no is extensively used in Florida and
oneway:flow=yes appears on most of the length of the Missisippi.
I suppose it's used in the same sense as you want to use your proposed tag
On 7 September 2015 at 17:29, David Marchal wrote:
> Hello, there.
>
>
2015-09-07 17:57 GMT+02:00 moltonel 3x Combo :
> I don't know of an existing tag. I've searched for 'flow' and
> 'up/downstream' in taginfo, but the only thing I found came from
> imports and had very bad values from an OSM POV. Unless somebody has a
> better Idea, I suggest
Wednesday 02 September 2015 13:51:09, André Pirard:
> What policy, what purpose, that's unclear?
> Is OSM.org using that API to display the history on the screen illegal?
> Is Osmose using it to attribute errors to some user illegal?
> Yep, I suppose that making oneself a complete list of OSM
I am need of a tag for this for many waterways near the sea here, as there
waterflow is controlled by gates or is tidal or is both. I like
flow_direction.
However it's a tricky business. Take the river Thames, which can be tidal
up to London, depending on tides (and wind). But I would be
On 8/09/2015 2:16 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-09-07 17:57 GMT+02:00 moltonel 3x Combo >:
I don't know of an existing tag. I've searched for 'flow' and
'up/downstream' in taginfo, but the only thing I found came from
imports
I was driving in Chiba and Saitama yesterday and encountered a couple new types
of barriers. I realized later one is traffic_calming=chicane.
The other one is all over rural Japan as traffic_calming=choker on rural roads
that could bypass traffic near the rivers, - but this one is not for
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Flow direction is the best of these (so far). It is descriptive of what is to
> be tagged.
What do they use for pipelines? I imagine there is some tag based on the way
direction that can indicate flow.
I don't think a new tag is warranted. maxwidth=* is fairly unequivocal.
If map users or routers want to interpret it as "max width, but probably
not really, there's probably a bit of extra space, I mean, who's going to
be that petty" then that's not your problem.
Since most roads do not have a
On 7 September 2015 17:38:45 GMT+01:00, Volker Schmidt
wrote:
>tidal
>up to London, depending on tides (and wind). But I would be reluctant
>to
>tag the river's water flow from London downwards as flow_direction=both
Yes, rivers can be tidal without their flow reversing.
11 matches
Mail list logo