Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Tagging National Forests

2016-05-10 Thread Warin
On 11/05/2016 4:12 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Il giorno 10 mag 2016, alle ore 19:55, Mike Thompson ha scritto: We really have a number of different facts we are attempting to represent: * What is on the ground (i.e. landcover). Currently this is

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Tagging National Forests

2016-05-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 10 mag 2016, alle ore 19:55, Mike Thompson ha > scritto: > > We really have a number of different facts we are attempting to represent: > * What is on the ground (i.e. landcover). Currently this is tagged > natural=wood, but we could change

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Tagging National Forests

2016-05-10 Thread Mike Thompson
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Elliott Plack wrote: > Thanks for the continued discussion. It seems that one of you removed the > offending landuse that I mentioned in my email yesterday (from an import > that was not attributed). As a result, the tiles have begun to

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Parklets

2016-05-10 Thread Paul Norman
On 5/9/2016 4:25 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: One of the main characteristics seems to me that it is semi-permanent : "A parklet may be thought of as permanent, but must be designed for quick and easy removal for emergencies or other reasons such as snow removal without damage to the curb or street"